Introduction: Awareness of the latest scientific research and publishing articles in top journals is one of the major concerns of health researchers. In this study, we first introduced top journals of obstetrics and gynecology field based on their Impact Factor (IF), Eigenfactor Score (ES) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator indexed in Scopus databases and then the scientometric features of longitudinal changes of SJR in this field were presented.
Method and material: In our analytical and bibiliometric study, we included all the journals of obstetrics and gynecology field which were indexed by Scopus from 1999 to 2013. The scientometric features in Scopus were derived from SCImago Institute and IF and ES were obtained from Journal Citation Report through the Institute for Scientific Information. Generalized Estimating Equation was used to assess the scientometric features affecting SJR.
Result: From 256 journals reviewed, 54.2% and 41.8% were indexed in the Pubmed and the Web of Sciences, respectively. Human Reproduction Update based on the IF (5.924±2.542) and SJR (2.682±1.185), and American Journal of obstetrics and gynecology based on the ES (0.05685±0.00633) obtained the first rank among the other journals. Time, Index in Pubmed, H_index, Citable per Document, Cites per Document, and IF affected changes of SJR in the period of study.
Discussion: Our study showed a significant association between SJR and scientometric features in obstetrics and gynecology journals. According to this relationship, SJR may be an appropriate index for assessing journal quality.
Keywords: Eigenfactor Score; Impact Factor; Journal quality; SCImago Journal Rank; obstetrics and gynecology.
Conflict of interest statement
Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals.Acta Inform Med. 2014 Apr;22(2):103-6. doi: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.103-106. Acta Inform Med. 2014. PMID: 24825934 Free PMC article.
Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals.Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012 Aug 27;15(2):132-6. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012. PMID: 22936507 Review.
Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor.FASEB J. 2008 Aug;22(8):2623-8. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-107938. Epub 2008 Apr 11. FASEB J. 2008. PMID: 18408168
Current biomedical scientific impact (2013) of institutions, academic journals and researchers in the Republic of Macedonia.Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):67-80. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0010. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014. PMID: 25711224
Changing trends in otorhinolaryngology publishing.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Mar 25. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-2192. Online ahead of print. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019. PMID: 30933183 Review.
- Uzun A. Library and information science research in developing countries and eastern European countries: a brief bibliometric perspective. International Information and Library Review. 2002;34(1):21–33.
- Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295:90–93. - PubMed
- Garfield E. Ciation analysis as a tool in journal evalution. Science. 1972;178:471–479. - PubMed
- Gasparyan AY. Thoughts on impact factors and editing of medical journals. Inflammation & allergy drug targets. 2010;9(1):2–5. - PubMed
- Falagas ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R, Karageorgopoulos DE. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. Faseb J. 2008;22(8):2623–2638. - PubMed