Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):248-57.
doi: 10.7326/M14-0611.

Single-component Versus Multicomponent Dietary Goals for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Trial

Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Single-component Versus Multicomponent Dietary Goals for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Trial

Yunsheng Ma et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free PMC article


Background: Few studies have compared diets to determine whether a program focused on 1 dietary change results in collateral effects on other untargeted healthy diet components.

Objective: To evaluate a diet focused on increased fiber consumption versus the multicomponent American Heart Association (AHA) dietary guidelines.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial from June 2009 to January 2014. ( NCT00911885).

Setting: Worcester, Massachusetts.

Participants: 240 adults with the metabolic syndrome.

Intervention: Participants engaged in individual and group sessions.

Measurements: Primary outcome was weight change at 12 months.

Results: At 12 months, mean change in weight was -2.1 kg (95% CI, -2.9 to -1.3 kg) in the high-fiber diet group versus -2.7 kg (CI, -3.5 to -2.0 kg) in the AHA diet group. The mean between-group difference was 0.6 kg (CI, -0.5 to 1.7 kg). During the trial, 12 (9.9%) and 15 (12.6%) participants dropped out of the high-fiber and AHA diet groups, respectively (P = 0.55). Eight participants developed diabetes (hemoglobin A1c level ≥6.5%) during the trial: 7 in the high-fiber diet group and 1 in the AHA diet group (P = 0.066).

Limitations: Generalizability is unknown. Maintenance of weight loss after cessation of group sessions at 12 months was not assessed. Definitive conclusions cannot be made about dietary equivalence because the study was powered for superiority.

Conclusion: The more complex AHA diet may result in up to 1.7 kg more weight loss; however, a simplified approach to weight reduction emphasizing only increased fiber intake may be a reasonable alternative for persons with difficulty adhering to more complicated diet regimens.

Primary funding source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.


Figure 1
Figure 1
Study participation and follow-up rates
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weight, dietary fiber, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR over time during the dietary trial Adjusted means were presented, bars indicate 95% confidence interval of the estimate

Comment in

Summary for patients in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 17 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data