Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0117807.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117807. eCollection 2015.

Proteomic signature of the murine intervertebral disc

Affiliations

Proteomic signature of the murine intervertebral disc

Matthew R McCann et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Low back pain is the most common musculoskeletal problem and the single most common cause of disability, often attributed to degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Lack of effective treatment is directly related to our limited understanding of the pathways responsible for maintaining disc health. While transcriptional analysis has permitted initial insights into the biology of the intervertebral disc, complete proteomic characterization is required. We therefore employed liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) protein/peptide separation and mass spectrometric analyses to characterize the protein content of intervertebral discs from skeletally mature wild-type mice. A total of 1360 proteins were identified and categorized using PANTHER. Identified proteins were primarily intracellular/plasma membrane (35%), organelle (30%), macromolecular complex (10%), extracellular region (9%). Molecular function categorization resulted in three distinct categories: catalytic activity (33%), binding (molecule interactions) (29%), and structural activity (13%). To validate our list, we confirmed the presence of 14 of 20 previously identified IVD-associated markers, including matrix proteins, transcriptional regulators, and secreted proteins. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed distinct localization patterns of select protein with the intervertebral disc. Characterization of the protein composition of healthy intervertebral disc tissue is an important first step in identifying cellular processes and pathways disrupted during aging or disease progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Proteomic signature of the murine intervertebral disc.
Pie chart depicting gene ontology (GO) analysis of proteins identified in the murine intervertebral disc. Representation of the distribution of proteins according to their molecular function as (A) biological process, (B) molecular function, (C) cellular component, and (D) protein class. Categorizations were based on information provided by the PANTHER classification system (www.pantherdb.org; v9.0). A total of 10 groups for molecular function, 12 groups for biological process, 7 cellular components, and 27 protein classes were detected. Further analysis of the intracellular classification revealed that the majority of proteins were characterized as cytoskeletal, followed by cytoplasmic, organelle and protein-transport ATP synthase complex.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Immunohistochemical staining validating the localization of proteins in the murine intervertebral disc.
Representative images demonstrating the immunolocalization of NFAT5, versican, Sox9, and BSP within the murine IVD. Each protein demonstrates a distinct pattern of localization within specific compartments of the disc. NFAT5 is localized to the NP and CEP, versican is present throughout the disc with high levels detected in the outer annulus, Sox9 is present in NP and CEP and BSP is only detected in the CEP. For each protein-specific antibody, sections corresponding to 3 IVDs were assessed for each animal; n = 3 mice. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C (2011) Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. - PubMed
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, et al. (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380: 2163–2196. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, et al. (2012) A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 64: 2028–2037. 10.1002/art.34347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman BW, O’Mahony S, Mulvey L, Davitt M, Choi H, et al. (2012) One-week and 3-month outcomes after an emergency department visit for undifferentiated musculoskeletal low back pain. Ann Emerg Med 59: 128–133 e123 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.09.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCann MR, Bacher CA, Seguin CA (2011) Exploiting notochord cells for stem cell-based regeneration of the intervertebral disc. J Cell Commun Signal 5: 39–43. 10.1007/s12079-010-0116-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources