The effects of different nickel-titanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation

Eur J Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):41-46. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.149638.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of dentinal microcracks caused by different preparation techniques.

Materials and methods: 120 extracted human mandibular incisor teeth were divided into five experimental groups and one control group (n = 20): Group 1: Hand preparation with balanced force technique up to #25 K-file. Group 2: Preparation with only ProTaper F2 instrument in a reciprocating movement. Group 3: Preparation with Reciproc R25 instrument in a reciprocating movement. Group 4: Preparation with ProTaper instruments up to F2 instrument. Group 5: Preparation with ProTaper Next instruments up to X2 instrument. No procedure was applied to control group. The roots were sectioned horizontally at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex and examined. Absence or presence of dentinal microcracks was noted.

Results: The Chi-square test was performed to compare the appearance of cracked roots between all groups. There were no significant differences among the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: In conclusion, except the hand file and control group, all experimental groups showed microcrack formations.

Keywords: Dentinal microcrack; ProTaper; Reciproc.