Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 8 (5), 373-84

Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: A Practical Guide

Affiliations
Review

Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: A Practical Guide

Esther W de Bekker-Grob et al. Patient.

Abstract

Discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) have become a commonly used instrument in health economics and patient-preference analysis, addressing a wide range of policy questions. An important question when setting up a DCE is the size of the sample needed to answer the research question of interest. Although theory exists as to the calculation of sample size requirements for stated choice data, it does not address the issue of minimum sample size requirements in terms of the statistical power of hypothesis tests on the estimated coefficients. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) to provide insight into whether and how researchers have dealt with sample size calculations for healthcare-related DCE studies; (2) to introduce and explain the required sample size for parameter estimates in DCEs; and (3) to provide a step-by-step guide for the calculation of the minimum sample size requirements for DCEs in health care.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 69 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–172. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D, de Bekker-Grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):883–902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–157. doi: 10.1086/259131. - DOI
    1. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974. pp. 105–142.
    1. Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Muhlbacher A, Regier DA, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Feedback