Visual Acuity and Experience with Magnification Devices in Swiss Dental Practices

Oper Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):E142-9. doi: 10.2341/14-103-C. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of the present study in Swiss dental practices were 1) to provide an update on the prevalence of different magnification devices, 2) to examine the relationship between self-assessed and objectively measured visual acuity, and 3) to evaluate the visual performance of dentists in the individually optimized clinical situation of their respective practices.

Methods and materials: Sixty-nine dentists from 40 randomly selected private practices (n=20, <40 years; n=49, ≥40 years) participated in the study. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate the self-assessed near visual acuity and the experience with magnification devices. The objective near visual acuity was measured under standardized conditions on a negatoscope. The clinical situation, including the use of habitual optical aids, was evaluated with visual tests on a phantom head.

Results: A total of 64% of the dentists owned a dental loupe: 45% Galilean loupes, 16% Keplerian loupes, and 3% single lens loupes. In total, 19% of the questioned dentists owned a microscope in addition to the loupes. The correlation between the self-assessed and the objective visual performance of the dentists was weak (Spearman rank correlation coefficient=0.25). In the habitual clinical situation, magnification devices (p=0.03) and the dentist's age (p=0.0012) had a significant influence on the visual performance.

Conclusions: Many dentists were not aware of their visual handicaps. Optical aids such as loupes or microscopes should be used early enough to compensate for individual or age-related visual deficiencies.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Dental Instruments*
  • Dentists
  • Humans
  • Lenses*
  • Microscopy / instrumentation
  • Middle Aged
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Switzerland
  • Vision Tests
  • Visual Acuity*