Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- PMID: 25756438
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.1474
Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Abstract
Importance: Introducing new medical devices into routine practice raises concerns because patients and outcomes may differ from those in randomized trials.
Objective: To update the previous report of 30-day outcomes and present 1-year outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States.
Design, setting, and participants: Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology (STS/ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry were linked with patient-specific Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrative claims data. At 299 US hospitals, 12 182 patients linked with CMS data underwent TAVR procedures performed from November 2011 through June 30, 2013, and the end of the follow-up period was June 30, 2014.
Exposure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Main outcomes and measures: One-year outcomes including mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization were evaluated using multivariate modeling.
Results: The median age of patients was 84 years and 52% were women, with a median STS Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality (STS PROM) score of 7.1%. Following the TAVR procedure, 59.8% were discharged to home and the 30-day mortality was 7.0% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.4%) (n = 847 deaths). In the first year after TAVR, patients were alive and out of the hospital for a median of 353 days (interquartile range, 312-359 days); 24.4% (n = 2074) of survivors were rehospitalized once and 12.5% (n = 1525) were rehospitalized twice. By 1 year, the overall mortality rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 22.8%-24.5%) (n = 2450 deaths), the stroke rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.7%-4.5%) (n = 455 stroke events), and the rate of the composite outcome of mortality and stroke was 26.0% (25.1%-26.8%) (n = 2719 events). Characteristics significantly associated with 1-year mortality included advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] for ≥95 vs <75 years, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.24-2.09]; HR for 85-94 years vs <75 years, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.18-1.55]; and HR for 75-84 years vs <75 years, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.08-1.41]), male sex (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.31), end-stage renal disease (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.41-1.95), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25-1.55), nontransfemoral access (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48), STS PROM score greater than 15% vs less than 8% (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.60-2.06), and preoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48). Compared with men, women had a higher risk of stroke (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.71).
Conclusions and relevance: Among patients undergoing TAVR in US clinical practice, at 1-year follow-up, overall mortality was 23.7%, the stroke rate was 4.1%, and the rate of the composite outcome of death and stroke was 26.0%. These findings should be helpful in discussions with patients undergoing TAVR.
Similar articles
-
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 31184741 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2069-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282043. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24240934
-
1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the First WIN-TAVI Registry.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.034. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29301640
-
Acute kidney injury after aortic valve replacement: incidence, risk factors and outcomes.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Mar;13(3):301-16. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1002467. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 25592763 Review.
-
Acquired Aseptic Intracardiac Shunts Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2527-2538. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Nov 23. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27889349 Review.
Cited by
-
Central blood pressure profile variability and prognostic impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Heart Vessels. 2024 Nov 19. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02488-1. Online ahead of print. Heart Vessels. 2024. PMID: 39560717
-
Modern Perspectives on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-No One Size Fits All.Tex Heart Inst J. 2024 Aug 1;51(2):e248423. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-24-8423. Tex Heart Inst J. 2024. PMID: 39086311 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Geriatric Workup and Frailty Assessment in Older Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):4169. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144169. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39064209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medical treatment of heart failure with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers in aortic stenosis: association with long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement.Eur Heart J Open. 2024 May 9;4(3):oeae039. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae039. eCollection 2024 May. Eur Heart J Open. 2024. PMID: 38812477 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency department imaging utilization post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement: single institution 7-year experience.Emerg Radiol. 2024 Jun;31(3):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02228-y. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Emerg Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38649665 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
