The impact of gout guidelines

Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 May;27(3):225-30. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000168.


Purpose of review: This review discusses the impact of recent treatment guidelines for the management of gout and the barriers to treating gout patients.

Recent findings: Multiple guidelines for both the treatment and prevention of gout have been put forth in the last decade including those from the British Rheumatism Society; the European League Against Rheumatism; the Multinational Evidence, Expertise, Exchange Initiative; the Japanese Society of Gout and Nucleic Acid Metabolism; the American College of Rheumatology. These guidelines are designed to facilitate the management of gout by providers with key recommendations for the management of hyperuricemia, which is the greatest risk factor for developing gout. However, despite the extant guidelines, overall adherence to recommendations and uptake have been slow and initiation of urate-lowering therapy, titration of dosing, and monitoring of serum urate is infrequent. Greater education in proper management as well as increased awareness of new treatment strategies appear to be the primary reasons for this gap and offer avenues for improvement in management as well as areas for further research.

Summary: Gout remains a treatment challenge for both acute and chronic disease. Despite the availability of management guidelines, primary care providers are struggling with appropriate management of the disease. More research tools and strategies are needed to improve overall outcomes and quality of care.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Gout / therapy*
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Primary Health Care / standards*