Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Mar 23;4(3):e001445.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001445.

Differential time trends of outcomes and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations by ST elevation and type of intervention in the United States, 2001-2011

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differential time trends of outcomes and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations by ST elevation and type of intervention in the United States, 2001-2011

Takehiro Sugiyama et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Little is known whether time trends of in-hospital mortality and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) differ by type of AMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] vs. non-ST-elevation [NSTEMI]) and by the intervention received (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], or no intervention) in the United States.

Methods and results: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of all hospitalizations for AMI aged 30 years or older using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2001-2011 (1,456,154 discharges; a weighted estimate of 7,135,592 discharges). Hospitalizations were stratified by type of AMI and intervention, and the time trends of in-hospital mortality and hospital costs were examined for each combination of the AMI type and intervention, after adjusting for both patient- and hospital-level characteristics. Compared with 2001, adjusted in-hospital mortality improved significantly for NSTEMI patients in 2011, regardless of the intervention received (PCI odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83; CABG OR 0.57, 0.45 to 0.72; without intervention OR 0.61, 0.57 to 0.65). As for STEMI, a decline in adjusted in-hospital mortality was significant for those who underwent PCI (OR 0.83; 0.73 to 0.94); however, no significant improvement was observed for those who received CABG or without intervention. Hospital costs per hospitalization increased significantly for patients who underwent intervention, but not for those without intervention.

Conclusions: In the United States, the decrease in in-hospital mortality and the increase in costs differed by the AMI type and the intervention received. These non-uniform trends may be informative for designing effective health policies to reduce the health and economic burdens of AMI.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; hospital costs; in‐hospital mortality; time trend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Temporal trends of in‐hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations in the United States by ST‐elevation/non‐ST‐elevation and percutaneous coronary intervention/cardiac bypass graft stenting use. Year 2001 was used as the reference. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Temporal trends of percent change of hospital costs for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations in the United States by ST‐elevation/non‐ST‐elevation and percutaneous coronary intervention/cardiac bypass graft stenting use. Year 2001 was used as the reference. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khera S, Kolte D, Palaniswamy C, Mujib M, Aronow WS, Singh T, Gotsis W, Silverman G, Frishman WH. ST‐elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly—temporal trends in incidence, utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in the United States. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:3683-3690. - PubMed
    1. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Sule S, Jain D, Gotsis W, Ahmed A, Frishman WH, Fonarow GC. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST‐elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3:e00059010.1161/JAHA.113.000590 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parikh NI, Gona P, Larson MG, Fox CS, Benjamin EJ, Murabito JM, O'Donnell CJ, Vasan RS, Levy D. Long‐term trends in myocardial infarction incidence and case fatality in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart study. Circulation. 2009; 119:1203-1210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M, Sorel M, Selby JV, Go AS. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:2155-2165. - PubMed
    1. Rosamond WD, Chambless LE, Heiss G, Mosley TH, Coresh J, Whitsel E, Wagenknecht L, Ni H, Folsom AR. Twenty‐two‐year trends in incidence of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease mortality, and case fatality in 4 US communities, 1987‐2008. Circulation. 2012; 125:1848-1857. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms