Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;156(7):1342-1347.
doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000163.

Neuromodulation of conditioned placebo/nocebo in heat pain: anodal vs cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Affiliations

Neuromodulation of conditioned placebo/nocebo in heat pain: anodal vs cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Natalia Egorova et al. Pain. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Placebo and nocebo play an important role in clinical practice and medical research. Modulating placebo/nocebo responses using noninvasive brain stimulation methods, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has the potential to harness these effects to therapeutic benefit in a clinical setting. In this study, we assessed the effect of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) on conditioned placebo/nocebo cue response to heat pain. Two matched groups of healthy volunteers were subjected to an identical session of conditioning, during which low and high cues (abstract images) were associated with low and high pain levels, respectively. Twenty-minute 2-mA tDCS (either anodal or cathodal) over the rDLPFC was applied. The influence of tDCS current polarity (anodal vs cathodal) on placebo and nocebo was assessed, using subjects' pain ratings in response to identical pain preceded by the conditioned high or low cues. The duration of cue presentation varied to allow either fully conscious or subliminal processing. Significant placebo and nocebo effects in the anodal but not the cathodal group were elicited with the conditioning paradigm. This study provides evidence of a possibility to modulate the conditioned placebo and nocebo effect by changing the excitability of the rDLPFC using tDCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest for any of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental procedure
Conditioning phase, tDCS application, test phase, cue recognition test.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Main results
A. Subjective pain ratings by perception level (conscious/subliminal) by tDCS group (anodal vs. cathodal). Mean and standard error of mean (SEM) values are reported. B. Mixed linear regression analysis: mean values and slopes for pain ratings by tDCS group by perception level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amanzio M, Benedetti F, Porro Ca, Palermo S, Cauda F. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of brain correlates of placebo analgesia in human experimental pain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013;34:738–752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atlas LY, Bolger N, Lindquist Ma, Wager TD. Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:12964–12977. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barsky AJ, Saintfort R, Rogers MP, Borus JF. Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon. JAMA. 2002;287:622–627. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11829702. - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. 2014 Available: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4.
    1. Benedetti F. Mechanisms of placebo and placebo related effects across diseases and treatments. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;20:S60–S61. - PubMed

Publication types