Patient Satisfaction: Why and How Patients Grade You and Your Pulmonary Practice
- PMID: 25811774
- DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-0223
Patient Satisfaction: Why and How Patients Grade You and Your Pulmonary Practice
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is an important factor for consideration in pulmonary practice management. Although evidence regarding the correlation of patient satisfaction with care quality remains mixed, there is an increasing national emphasis on the importance of patient experience in physician reimbursement, credentialing, and public opinion. The introduction of the Affordable Care Act and value-based care purchasing has tied a portion of reimbursement to patient experience surveys and other metrics related to care quality rather than quantity. Through nationally recognized assessments such as the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys and easily accessible websites such as RateMD and Yelp, patient opinion of care quality is more widely available and more important to pulmonary practice than ever before. Physician credentialing may also be impacted by the American Board of Internal Medicine's Maintenance of Certification program and potential future requirements for physicians to assess the patient experience to maintain certification. In the continually evolving health-care delivery, credentialing, and reimbursement climate, a thorough understanding of the increasing importance of patient satisfaction as well as strategies for successfully approaching this issue are essential to modern pulmonary inpatient and outpatient practice management.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Nurse Certification Rates on Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes: A Literature Review.J Contin Educ Nurs. 2015 Dec;46(12):549-54; quiz 555-6. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20151112-06. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2015. PMID: 26641152 Review.
-
The mis-measure of physician performance.Am J Manag Care. 2013 Oct;19(10):782-5. Am J Manag Care. 2013. PMID: 24304157
-
Reduce readmissions with service-based care management.Prof Case Manag. 2014 Nov-Dec;19(6):255-62. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000051. Prof Case Manag. 2014. PMID: 25271943
-
Magnet Hospitals: Higher Rates of Patient Satisfaction.Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2014 Feb;15(1-2):30-41. doi: 10.1177/1527154414538102. Epub 2014 Jun 10. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2014. PMID: 24915864
-
Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence.J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Fall;33 Suppl 1:S20-35. doi: 10.1002/chp.21203. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013. PMID: 24347150 Review.
Cited by
-
Characterizing extremely negative reviews of total joint arthroplasty practices and surgeons on yelp.com.Arthroplast Today. 2019 Apr 10;5(2):216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.02.009. eCollection 2019 Jun. Arthroplast Today. 2019. PMID: 31286047 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing residents' knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017100. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28827266 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
