Delay of Surgery for Melanoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries
- PMID: 25853865
- DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.119
Delay of Surgery for Melanoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Abstract
Importance: Timely delivery of surgery for cancer affects health care quality and outcomes. However, population-based studies characterizing the delay of surgery for melanoma in the United States have not been performed.
Objective: To assess the delay of surgery for melanoma by tumor-, patient-, and physician-level characteristics.
Design, setting, and participants: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed as having melanoma from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2009, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. We included all patients undergoing surgical excision of melanoma diagnosed by means of results of skin biopsy.
Exposures: Anatomic location and stage of the tumor, patient sociodemographic characteristics, prior melanoma, Elixhauser comorbidities, and the specialties of the physicians who performed the biopsy and surgery.
Main outcomes and measures: Surgical delay, measured as the time from the biopsy to surgical excision. We estimated risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and marginal probabilities of delay with 95% CIs for each covariate using mixed-effects logistic regression.
Results: Our cohort consisted of 32 501 cases of melanoma. Most of the patients were white (95.4%), male (63.1%), married (47.9%), and 75 years or older (60.8%) and did not have a prior melanoma (93.7%). Melanomas were most frequently located on the head and neck (40.5%) and staged as in situ disease (48.2%). More than three-quarters of cases (25 269 [77.7%]) underwent excision within 1.5 months of biopsy. Among those treated after 1.5 months (7232 [22.3%]), 2620 (8.1% of all cases) experienced a delay of longer than 3 months. The incidence of a risk-adjusted surgical delay longer than 1.5 months was significantly increased among patients 85 years or older compared with those younger than 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05-1.55]; P = .02), those with a prior melanoma (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.08-1.34]; P = .001), and those with an increased comorbidity burden (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09-1.27]; P < .001). Melanomas that underwent biopsy and excision by dermatologists had the lowest likelihood of delay (probability, 16% [95% CI, 14%-18%]). The highest likelihood of delay (probability, 31% [95% CI, 24%-37%]) occurred when the biopsy was performed by a nondermatologist and excised by a primary care physician. Similar findings were observed for a delay longer than 3 months.
Conclusions and relevance: Approximately 1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries experience a delay of surgery for melanoma that is longer than 1.5 months. Those patients undergoing biopsy and surgery by dermatologists have the lowest risk for delay, highlighting potential opportunities for improved access to and coordination of dermatologic care.
Comment in
-
Timely Surgical Follow-up for Melanoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Jul;151(7):741. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0559. JAMA Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 25853574 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Association of Delays in Surgery for Melanoma With Insurance Type.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1106-1113. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3338. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28979974 Free PMC article.
-
Timely Surgical Follow-up for Melanoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Jul;151(7):741. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0559. JAMA Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 25853574 No abstract available.
-
Frequency of and risk factors for tumor upstaging after wide local excision of primary cutaneous melanoma.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Aug;77(2):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.018. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28601390
-
Treatment disparities for disabled medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.042. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008. PMID: 18373987 Review.
-
Surgical Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;100(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Oct 28. Surg Clin North Am. 2020. PMID: 31753116 Review.
Cited by
-
The intersection of melanoma survival and social determinants of health in the United States: A systematic review.JAAD Int. 2024 Aug 2;17:126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2024.07.006. eCollection 2024 Dec. JAAD Int. 2024. PMID: 39399338 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measuring the quality of skin cancer management in primary care: A scoping review.Australas J Dermatol. 2023 May;64(2):177-193. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14023. Epub 2023 Mar 24. Australas J Dermatol. 2023. PMID: 36960976 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disparities in access for melanoma screening by region, specialty, and insurance: A cross-sectional audit study.JAAD Int. 2022 Mar 29;7:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.02.008. eCollection 2022 Jun. JAAD Int. 2022. PMID: 35373156 Free PMC article.
-
Duration of acceptable delay between the time of diagnosis and treatment of melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Jun;36(6):e460-e464. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17950. Epub 2022 Feb 3. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022. PMID: 35067989 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Factors associated with time to surgery in melanoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Oct;81(4):908-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.079. Epub 2019 Jun 1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 31163238 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
