Comparing Preoperative Targets to Failure-to-Rescue for Surgical Mortality Improvement
- PMID: 25863680
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.036
Comparing Preoperative Targets to Failure-to-Rescue for Surgical Mortality Improvement
Abstract
Background: Failure-to-rescue (FTR or death after postoperative complication) is thought to explain surgical mortality excesses across hospitals, and FTR is an emerging performance measure and target for quality improvement. We compared the FTR population to preoperatively identifiable subpopulations for their potential to close the mortality gap between lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals.
Study design: Patients undergoing small bowel resection, pancreatectomy, colorectal resection, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, lower extremity arterial bypass, and nephrectomy were identified in the 2007 to 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals were defined using risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality quintiles. Five target subpopulations were established a priori: the FTR population, predicted high-mortality risk (predicted highest-risk quintile), emergency surgery, elderly (>75 years old), and diabetic patients.
Results: Across the lowest mortality quintile (n=282 hospitals, 56,893 patients) and highest-mortality quintile (282 hospitals, 45,784 patients), respectively, the size of target subpopulations varied only for the FTR population (20.2% vs 22.4%, p=0.002) but not for other subpopulations. Variation in mortality rates across lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals was greatest for the high-mortality risk (7.5% vs 20.2%, p<0.0001) and FTR subpopulations (7.8% vs 18.9%, p<0.0001). The FTR and high-risk populations had comparable sensitivity (81% and 75%) and positive predictive value (19% and 20%, respectively) for mortality. In Monte Carlo simulations, the mortality gap between the lowest- and highest-mortality hospitals was reduced by nearly 75% when targeting the FTR population or the high-risk population, 78% for the emergency surgery population, but less for elderly (51%) and diabetic (17%) populations.
Conclusions: Preoperatively identifiable patients with high estimated mortality risk may be preferable to the FTR population as a target for surgical mortality reduction.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Hospital variation in mortality after emergent bowel resections: The role of failure-to-rescue.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 May;84(5):702-710. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001827. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018. PMID: 29401188
-
Hospital variation in failure to rescue after colorectal cancer surgery: results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;20(7):2117-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2896-7. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23417434
-
Complications and Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Noncardiac Surgery in the Veterans Affairs Health System.JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1157-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2920. JAMA Surg. 2016. PMID: 27653498
-
Failure to rescue in the surgical patient: a review.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Dec;25(6):706-711. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000667. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 31567517 Review.
-
A systematic review to identify the factors that affect failure to rescue and escalation of care in surgery.Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):752-63. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.017. Surgery. 2015. PMID: 25794627 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Research Using the National Inpatient Sample: A Brief Review of Colorectal Studies Utilizing the NIS Database.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):33-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673352. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019. PMID: 30647544 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Where We Fail: Location and Timing of Failure to Rescue in Trauma.Am Surg. 2017 Mar 1;83(3):250-256. Am Surg. 2017. PMID: 28316308 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
