Comparative analysis of nursing and midwifery regulatory and professional bodies' scope of practice and associated decision-making frameworks: a discussion paper

J Adv Nurs. 2015 Aug;71(8):1797-811. doi: 10.1111/jan.12660. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

Abstract

Aims: To review, discuss and compare nursing and midwifery regulatory and professional bodies' scope of practice and associated decision-making frameworks.

Background: Scope of practice in professional nursing and midwifery is an evolving process which needs to be responsive to clinical, service, societal, demographic and fiscal changes. Codes and frameworks offer a system of rules and principles by which the nursing and midwifery professions are expected to regulate members and demonstrate responsibility to society.

Design: Discussion paper.

Data sources: Twelve scope of practice and associated decision-making frameworks (January 2000-March 2014).

Implications for nursing: Two main approaches to the regulation of the scope of practice and associated decision-making frameworks exist internationally. The first approach is policy and regulation driven and behaviour oriented. The second approach is based on notions of autonomous decision-making, professionalism and accountability. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive, but have similar elements with a different emphasis. Both approaches lack explicit recognition of the aesthetic aspects of care and patient choice, which is a fundamental principle of evidence-based practice.

Conclusion: Nursing organizations, regulatory authorities and nurses should recognize that scope of practice and the associated responsibility for decision-making provides a very public statement about the status of nursing in a given jurisdiction.

Keywords: clinical judgement; midwifery; nurse roles; nursing; professional regulation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making*
  • Ireland
  • Legislation, Nursing*
  • Midwifery / legislation & jurisprudence*