Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):765-76.
doi: 10.7326/M14-2221.

Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Free article
Review

Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Shelley Selph et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus could lead to earlier identification and treatment of asymptomatic diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), potentially resulting in improved outcomes.

Purpose: To update the 2008 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on diabetes screening in adults.

Data sources: Cochrane databases and MEDLINE (2007 through October 2014) and relevant studies from previous Task Force reviews.

Study selection: Randomized, controlled trials; controlled, observational studies; and systematic reviews.

Data extraction: Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and checked by a second; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality.

Data synthesis: In 2 trials, screening for diabetes was associated with no 10-year mortality benefit versus no screening (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.25]). Sixteen trials consistently found that treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes. Most trials of treatment of IFG or IGT found no effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, although lifestyle modification was associated with decreased risk for both outcomes after 23 years in 1 trial. For screen-detected diabetes, 1 trial found no effect of an intensive multifactorial intervention on risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality versus standard control. In diabetes that was not specifically screen-detected, 9 systematic reviews found that intensive glucose control did not reduce risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and results for intensive blood pressure control were inconsistent.

Limitation: The review was restricted to English-language articles, and few studies were conducted in screen-detected populations.

Conclusion: Screening for diabetes did not improve mortality rates after 10 years of follow-up. More evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of treatments for screen-detected diabetes. Treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes.

Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources