Different levels in alcohol and tobacco consumption in head and neck cancer patients from 1957 to 2013

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0124045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124045. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Objective: To provide a precise quantification of the association between alcohol and tobacco consumption trends in head and neck cancer patients over the past 45 years.

Methods: We combined findings from all studies published until March 2014 and evaluated the association between different levels in alcohol and tobacco consumption and head and neck cancers through a meta-analytic approach.

Results: We included 28 studies involving 13830 patients with head and neck cancer. In patients with alcohol consumption, the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 1.29(1.06-1.57), 2.67(2.05-3.48) and 6.63(5.02-8.74) for light drinkers, moderate drinkers and heavy drinkers, respectively. In patients with tobacco consumption, the pooled OR and 95% CI were 2.33(1.84-2.95), 4.97(3.67-6.71) and 6.77(4.81-9.53) for light smokers, moderate smokers and heavy smokers, respectively.

Conclusion: The increased alcohol and tobacco consumption trends increased the risk of head and neck cancer over the past 45 years. Tobacco consumption was found to be a stronger risk factor for head and neck cancer than alcohol consumption. Thus, the control should be considered to limit the intake of alcohol and tobacco.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alcohol Drinking / adverse effects*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / etiology*
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Risk Factors
  • Smoking / adverse effects*
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81302361), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20133234120013), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M540457), Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1301018A), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD, 2014-37). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.