Surgical advances in bladder cancer: at what cost?

Urol Clin North Am. 2015 May;42(2):235-52, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

Abstract

Bladder cancer is the most expensive cancer to treat from diagnosis to death. Frequent disease recurrence, intense follow-up, and expensive, invasive techniques for diagnosis and treatment drive these costs for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Fluorescence cystoscopy increases the detection of superficial bladder cancer and reduces costs by improving the quality of resection and reducing recurrences. Radical cystectomy with intestinal diversion is the mainstay of treatment of invasive disease; however it is associated with substantial cost and morbidity. Increased efforts to improve the surgical management of bladder cancer while reducing the cost of treatment are increasingly necessary.

Keywords: Alvimopan; Bladder cancer; Blue-light cystoscopy; Costs; Quality of life; Robotic cystectomy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Cystectomy / adverse effects
  • Cystectomy / economics
  • Cystoscopy / adverse effects
  • Cystoscopy / economics
  • Gastrointestinal Agents / economics
  • Gastrointestinal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Humans
  • Ileus / economics
  • Ileus / etiology
  • Ileus / prevention & control
  • Length of Stay / economics
  • Piperidines / economics
  • Piperidines / therapeutic use
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / economics
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / surgery*

Substances

  • Gastrointestinal Agents
  • Piperidines
  • alvimopan