Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr 9:11:15.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0100-5.

Corporate social responsibility in global health: an exploratory study of multinational pharmaceutical firms

Affiliations
Review

Corporate social responsibility in global health: an exploratory study of multinational pharmaceutical firms

Hayley Droppert et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: As pharmaceutical firms experience increasing civil society pressure to act responsibly in a changing globalized world, many are expanding and/or reforming their corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies. We sought to understand how multinational pharmaceutical companies currently engage in CSR activities in the developing world aimed at global health impact, their motivations for doing so and how their CSR strategies are evolving.

Methods: We conducted a small-scale, exploratory study combining (i) an in-depth review of publicly available data on pharmaceutical firms' CSR with (ii) interviews of representatives from 6 firms, purposively selected, from the highest earning pharmaceutical firms worldwide.

Results: Corporate social responsibility differed for each firm particularly with respect to how CSR is defined, organizational structures for managing CSR, current CSR activities, and motivations for CSR. Across the firms studied, the common CSR activities were: differential pharmaceutical pricing, strengthening developing country drug distribution infrastructure, mHealth initiatives, and targeted research and development. Primary factors that motivated CSR engagement were: reputational benefits, recruitment and employee satisfaction, better rankings in sustainability indices, entrance into new markets, long-term economic returns, and improved population health. In terms of CSR strategy, firms were at different points on a spectrum ranging from philanthropic donations to integrated systemic shared value business models.

Conclusions: CSR is of increasing importance for multinational pharmaceutical firms yet understanding of the array of CSR strategies employed and their effects is nascent. Our study points to the need to (i) develop clearer and more standardized definitions of CSR in global health (2) strengthen indices to track CSR strategies and their public health effects in developing countries and (iii) undertake more country level studies that investigate how CSR engages with national health systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Porter ME, Kramer MR. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev. 2002;80:56–68. - PubMed
    1. United Nations (UN). Global Compact: Corporate Sustainability in The World Economy. 2014. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/index.html. Accessed 25 April 2014.
    1. Chhabra E. Corporate Social Responsibility: Should It Be A Law? Forbes. 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/eshachhabra/2014/04/18/corporate-social-resp.... Accessed 17 February 2014.
    1. Blowfield M, Frynas JG. Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. Intl Affairs. 2005;81:499–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00465.x. - DOI
    1. Hopkins M. Corporate social responsibility: Is business the solution? London: Earthscan; 2007.