Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7):20150070. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150070. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the influence of different voxel resolutions of two different CBCT units on the in vitro detection of periodontal defects.

Methods: The study used 12 dry skulls with a maxilla and a mandible. Artificial defects (dehiscence, tunnel, fenestration) were separately created on the anterior, premolar and molar teeth using burrs. A total of 14 dehiscences, 13 fenestrations, 8 tunnels and 16 non-defect controls were used in the study. Images were obtained from two different CBCT units in six voxel sizes (voxel size: 0.080, 0.100, 0.125, 0.150, 0.160 and 0.200 mm3). Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess both intra- and interobserver agreements for each image set.

Results: Overall intraobserver kappa coefficients ranged between 0.978 and 0.973 for the 0.080-mm3 images and between 0.751 and 0.737 for the 0.160-mm3 images, suggesting notably high intraobserver agreement for detecting periodontal defects. CBCT performed significantly better at detecting fenestrations (p<0.05) than tunnel and dehiscence defects. No statistically significant difference was found between the detection of dehiscence and tunnel defects (p>0.05).

Conclusions: A voxel size of 0.150 mm3 was identified as the cut-off point for overall detection of periodontal defects. CBCT should be considered the most reliable imaging modality for the diagnosis of periodontal defects.

Keywords: cone beam computed tomography; diagnosis; periodontal diseases; radiology; voxel size.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Alveolar Bone Loss / diagnostic imaging*
  • Alveolar Process / diagnostic imaging
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Periodontal Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Skull / diagnostic imaging