Developing a Comprehensive Model of Intensive Care Unit Processes: Concept of Operations
- PMID: 25909826
- DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000189
Developing a Comprehensive Model of Intensive Care Unit Processes: Concept of Operations
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to use a systems engineering approach to improve performance and stakeholder engagement in the intensive care unit to reduce several different patient harms.
Methods: We developed a conceptual framework or concept of operations (ConOps) to analyze different types of harm that included 4 steps as follows: risk assessment, appropriate therapies, monitoring and feedback, as well as patient and family communications. This framework used a transdisciplinary approach to inventory the tasks and work flows required to eliminate 7 common types of harm experienced by patients in the intensive care unit. The inventory gathered both implicit and explicit information about how the system works or should work and converted the information into a detailed specification that clinicians could understand and use.
Prototype conops to eliminate harm: Using the ConOps document, we created highly detailed work flow models to reduce harm and offer an example of its application to deep venous thrombosis. In the deep venous thrombosis model, we identified tasks that were synergistic across different types of harm. We will use a system of systems approach to integrate the variety of subsystems and coordinate processes across multiple types of harm to reduce the duplication of tasks. Through this process, we expect to improve efficiency and demonstrate synergistic interactions that ultimately can be applied across the spectrum of potential patient harms and patient locations.
Conclusions: Engineering health care to be highly reliable will first require an understanding of the processes and work flows that comprise patient care. The ConOps strategy provided a framework for building complex systems to reduce patient harm.
Similar articles
-
A model for increasing patient safety in the intensive care unit: increasing the implementation rates of proven safety measures.Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024844. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009. PMID: 19204137
-
How safe is my intensive care unit? Methods for monitoring and measurement.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Dec;13(6):703-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1bb44. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17975394 Review.
-
A comprehensive approach to quality management of intensive care services.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(3):287-300. doi: 10.1108/09526861011029352. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010. PMID: 20535901
-
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification.In: Kobeissy FH, editor. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2015. Chapter 25. In: Kobeissy FH, editor. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2015. Chapter 25. PMID: 26269925 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Intensive care unit providers more quickly and accurately assess risk of multiple harms using an engineered safety display.Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1692-1704. doi: 10.1177/1460458218796638. Epub 2018 Sep 17. Health Informatics J. 2019. PMID: 30222032
Cited by
-
Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e95-e102. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw118. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27539199 Free PMC article.
-
Fifteen years after To Err is Human: a success story to learn from.BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):396-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004720. Epub 2015 Dec 15. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. PMID: 26669931 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
