Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;34(5):819-27.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1084.

Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source

Affiliations

Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source

R Tamara Konetzka et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May.

Abstract

Market-based reforms in health care, such as public reporting of quality, may inadvertently exacerbate disparities. We examined how the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services' five-star rating system for nursing homes has affected residents who are dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid ("dual eligibles"), a particularly vulnerable and disadvantaged population. Specifically, we assessed the extent to which dual eligibles and non-dual eligibles avoided the lowest-rated nursing homes and chose the highest-rated homes once the five-star rating system began, in late 2008. We found that both populations resided in better-quality homes over time but that by 2010 the increased likelihood of choosing the highest-rated homes was substantially smaller for dual eligibles than for non-dual eligibles. Thus, the gap in quality, as measured by a nursing home's star rating, grew over time. Furthermore, we found that the benefit of the five-star system to dual eligibles was largely due to providers' improving their ratings, not to consumers' choosing different providers. We present evidence suggesting that supply constraints play a role in limiting dual eligibles' responses to quality ratings, since high-quality providers tend to be located close to relatively affluent areas. Increases in Medicaid payment rates for nursing home services may be the only long-term solution.

Keywords: Access To Care; Long-Term Care; Medicaid; Medicare; Quality Of Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1. Star Ratings Of Nursing Homes In Which Dual Eligibles Resided, 2008-10
SOURCE Authors’ analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Nursing Home Compare; the Nursing Home Minimum Data Set, version 2.0; and the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File.
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2. Star Ratings Of Nursing Homes In Which Non-Dual Eligibles Resided, 2008-10
SOURCE Authors’ analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Nursing Home Compare; the Nursing Home Minimum Data Set, version 2.0; and the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akerlof GA. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and market mechanism. Q J Econ. 1970;84(3):488–500.
    1. Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):111–23. - PubMed
    1. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000;283(14):1866–74. - PubMed
    1. Dranove D, Sfekas A. Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards. J Health Econ. 2008;27(5):1201–7. - PubMed
    1. Chernew M, Gowrisankaran G, Scanlon DP. Learning and the value of information: evidence from health plan report cards. J Econom. 2008;144(1):156–74.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources