Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source
- PMID: 25941284
- PMCID: PMC6344885
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1084
Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source
Abstract
Market-based reforms in health care, such as public reporting of quality, may inadvertently exacerbate disparities. We examined how the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services' five-star rating system for nursing homes has affected residents who are dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid ("dual eligibles"), a particularly vulnerable and disadvantaged population. Specifically, we assessed the extent to which dual eligibles and non-dual eligibles avoided the lowest-rated nursing homes and chose the highest-rated homes once the five-star rating system began, in late 2008. We found that both populations resided in better-quality homes over time but that by 2010 the increased likelihood of choosing the highest-rated homes was substantially smaller for dual eligibles than for non-dual eligibles. Thus, the gap in quality, as measured by a nursing home's star rating, grew over time. Furthermore, we found that the benefit of the five-star system to dual eligibles was largely due to providers' improving their ratings, not to consumers' choosing different providers. We present evidence suggesting that supply constraints play a role in limiting dual eligibles' responses to quality ratings, since high-quality providers tend to be located close to relatively affluent areas. Increases in Medicaid payment rates for nursing home services may be the only long-term solution.
Keywords: Access To Care; Long-Term Care; Medicaid; Medicare; Quality Of Care.
Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association Between 5-Star Nursing Home Report Card Ratings and Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations.Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018787323. doi: 10.1177/0046958018787323. Inquiry. 2018. PMID: 30027799 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in Accessing Nursing Homes With High Star Ratings.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):852-859.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 5. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29983361
-
Comparison of Consumer Rankings With Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Five-Star Rankings of Nursing Homes.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204798. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4798. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32407503 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of COVID-19 on Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: A Scoping Review.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Oct;24(10):1565-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Sep 9. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37696498 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incentive regulation of nursing homes.J Health Econ. 1992 Aug;11(2):105-28. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90030-5. J Health Econ. 1992. PMID: 10171309 Review.
Cited by
-
Home Health Quality among Hospitalized Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia: Association with Race/Ethnicity and Dual Eligibility before and during the COVID Pandemic.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):105057. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105057. Epub 2024 Jun 4. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38843869
-
Unaddressed functional difficulty and care support among White, Black, and Hispanic older adults in the last decade.Health Aff Sch. 2023 Sep;1(3):qxad041. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad041. Epub 2023 Sep 1. Health Aff Sch. 2023. PMID: 38274860 Free PMC article.
-
The health effects of nursing home specialization in post-acute care.J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;92:102823. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102823. Epub 2023 Sep 25. J Health Econ. 2023. PMID: 37839286 Free PMC article.
-
Getting to the root: Examining within and between home health agency inequities in functional improvement.Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14194. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14194. Epub 2023 Jun 25. Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 37356822
-
Solving racial/ethnic disparities associated with Medicare Part D Star Ratings.Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Jul;39(7):963-971. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2217654. Epub 2023 Jun 5. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023. PMID: 37219396 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Akerlof GA. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and market mechanism. Q J Econ. 1970;84(3):488–500.
-
- Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):111–23. - PubMed
-
- Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000;283(14):1866–74. - PubMed
-
- Dranove D, Sfekas A. Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards. J Health Econ. 2008;27(5):1201–7. - PubMed
-
- Chernew M, Gowrisankaran G, Scanlon DP. Learning and the value of information: evidence from health plan report cards. J Econom. 2008;144(1):156–74.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
