Performance breakdown in optimal stimulus decoding
- PMID: 25946561
- DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/036012
Performance breakdown in optimal stimulus decoding
Abstract
Objective: One of the primary goals of neuroscience is to understand how neurons encode and process information about their environment. The problem is often approached indirectly by examining the degree to which the neuronal response reflects the stimulus feature of interest.
Approach: In this context, the methods of signal estimation and detection theory provide the theoretical limits on the decoding accuracy with which the stimulus can be identified. The Cramér-Rao lower bound on the decoding precision is widely used, since it can be evaluated easily once the mathematical model of the stimulus-response relationship is determined. However, little is known about the behavior of different decoding schemes with respect to the bound if the neuronal population size is limited.
Main results: We show that under broad conditions the optimal decoding displays a threshold-like shift in performance in dependence on the population size. The onset of the threshold determines a critical range where a small increment in size, signal-to-noise ratio or observation time yields a dramatic gain in the decoding precision.
Significance: We demonstrate the existence of such threshold regions in early auditory and olfactory information coding. We discuss the origin of the threshold effect and its impact on the design of effective coding approaches in terms of relevant population size.
Similar articles
-
On the Cramér-Rao bound applicability and the role of Fisher information in computational neuroscience.Biosystems. 2015 Oct;136:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Aug 11. Biosystems. 2015. PMID: 26276412
-
Neuronal population decoding explains the change in signal detection sensitivity caused by task-irrelevant perceptual bias.Neural Comput. 2010 Oct;22(10):2586-614. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00019. Neural Comput. 2010. PMID: 20608864
-
A review of the methods for neuronal response latency estimation.Biosystems. 2015 Oct;136:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 1. Biosystems. 2015. PMID: 25939679 Review.
-
Effects of noise correlations on information encoding and decoding.J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;95(6):3633-44. doi: 10.1152/jn.00919.2005. Epub 2006 Mar 22. J Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16554512
-
Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design.Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:493-507. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65031-0. Prog Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17925266 Review.
Cited by
-
Identifiability of a Binomial Synapse.Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Sep 30;14:558477. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.558477. eCollection 2020. Front Comput Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33117139 Free PMC article.
-
Are single-peaked tuning curves tuned for speed rather than accuracy?Elife. 2023 May 16;12:e84531. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84531. Elife. 2023. PMID: 37191292 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources