Cooperative Base Pair Melting by Helicase and Polymerase Positioned One Nucleotide From Each Other
Free PMC article
Item in Clipboard
Cooperative Base Pair Melting by Helicase and Polymerase Positioned One Nucleotide From Each Other
Free PMC article
Leading strand DNA synthesis requires functional coupling between replicative helicase and DNA polymerase (DNAP) enzymes, but the structural and mechanistic basis of coupling is poorly understood. This study defines the precise positions of T7 helicase and T7 DNAP at the replication fork junction with single-base resolution to create a structural model that explains the mutual stimulation of activities. Our 2-aminopurine studies show that helicase and polymerase both participate in DNA melting, but each enzyme melts the junction base pair partially. When combined, the junction base pair is melted cooperatively provided the helicase is located one nucleotide ahead of the primer-end. The synergistic shift in equilibrium of junction base pair melting by combined enzymes explains the cooperativity, wherein helicase stimulates the polymerase by promoting dNTP binding (decreasing dNTP Km), polymerase stimulates the helicase by increasing the unwinding rate-constant (kcat), consequently the combined enzymes unwind DNA with kinetic parameters resembling enzymes translocating on single-stranded DNA.
2-aminopurine; DNA polymerase; E. coli; bacteriophage; biochemistry; biophysics; helicase; presteady state kinetics; replication; structural biology; viruses.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Figure 1.. Kinetic mechanism of DNA unwinding by T7 DNAP.
A) Preformed replication fork DNA substrate for the measurement of the unwinding kinetics of T7 DNA polymerase (DNAP). ( B) Representative kinetics of DNA unwinding by T7 DNAP in the presence of E. coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) (dots) fit to the n-step model (solid line). ( C) The base pair unwinding rates are plotted against dNTPs concentration and fit to Equation 4 (solid line) to obtain the unwinding k cat and dNTPs K m values. ( D, E) The unwinding k cat and K m of T7 DNAP plotted against GC percentages. ( F) The three-step ordered model of base-capture, dNTP binding, and nucleotide incorporation that describes the unwinding kinetics of T7 DNAP. ( G) Equilibrium constants of the base-capture step obtained from fitting the kinetics data to the three-step model in F are plotted against increasing GC percentages. Details of the kinetic fittings are provided in Appendix—Section 2. DOI:
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Unwinding by T7 DNAP with gp2.5 and SSB.
A) Unwinding rate of T7 DNAP with T7 gp2.5 (3 μM) and E. coli SSB (200 nM) of the 20% GC DNA substrate at 50 μM dNTPs concentration. Both T7 gp2.5 and E. coli SSB can stimulate the unwinding rate of the T7 DNAP. ( B) Relative rate of DNA unwinding by T7 DNAP with increasing concentration of E. coli SSB to determine the optimum concentration of SSB to use in the unwinding experiments. ‘SSB concentration’ refers to monomer concentrations. Relative rate of DNA unwinding of T7 DNAP with increasing concentration of T7 gp2.5 shows that stimulation by T7 gp2.5 saturates at ∼3 μM concentrations. ( C) No increase in fluorescence signal from the DNA (20% GC) is observed in the absence of DNA synthesis by the T7 DNAP showing that E. coli SSB by itself does not unwind the DNA. ( D) Kinetic trace for strand displacement DNA synthesis using the fluorescence-based assay shows the increase in lag time when the length of the dsDNA in the replication fork substrate is increased. The experiment was done in a stopped-flow setup with 35% GC DNA substrate and 100 μM dNTPs concentration. DOI:
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.. Unwinding trace of T7 DNAP with SSB.
A) The kinetic trace for strand displacement DNA synthesis using the fluorescence-based assay shows an initial time lag followed by fluorescence increase in two phases. The traces shown are using the 20% GC DNA substrate. ( B) Effect of SSB binding to ssDNA with fluorescein in the 3′ end of the ssDNA. A description of the kinetic trace is provided in Appendix—Section 1. ( C) Effect of increasing SSB concentration on the second phase observed in the fluorescence traces obtained with DNAP and SSB. The traces shown are using the 35% GC DNA substrate. DOI:
Figure 1—figure supplement 3.. Fitting kinetics of unwinding by T7 DNAP with SSB.
The rate dependencies of the T7 DNAP as a function of dNTPs concentration for dsDNA of increasing GC content were fit to the minimal mechanism shown above to estimate the
K 1 values shown in Figure 1G. K d, dNTP was fixed at 10 μM, which corresponds to the K d, dNTP for the DNAP on primer-template DNA. k cat was allowed to float as a global parameter. Details about the fitting equations are provided in Appendix—Section 2. DOI:
Figure 2.. Kinetic mechanism of DNA unwinding by T7 helicase.
A) Replication fork DNA for the measurement of the unwinding kinetics of T7 helicase. ( B) Representative kinetic trace of DNA unwinding by T7 helicase (dots) fit to the n-step model (solid line). ( C) The unwinding rates against dTTP concentrations fit to Equation 4 (solid line) to obtain the unwinding k cat and dTTP K m values. ( D, E) The k cat and dTTP K m plotted as a function of GC percentages. ( F) Schematic of the helicase model with random order of base-capture and dTTP binding. ( G, H) Plots of equilibrium constants for the base-capture steps in the dTTP free ( K 1) and dTTP bound ( K 2) state as a function of GC percentages. K d, dTTP was fixed at 90 μM, which corresponds to the K m, dTTP for the helicase when translocating on ssDNA (Figure 2—figure supplement 2 and Appendix—Section 4). k cat was fixed at 130 nt/s corresponding to the ssDNA translocation rate of the helicase (Kim et al., 2002). Details of the fittings are provided in Appendix—Section 3. DOI:
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. Fitting kinetics of unwinding by T7 helicase.
The dTTP dependency data for unwinding by the helicase on the 20–65% GC DNA were fit to the model A (
A) model B ( B and C) and model C ( D). The data do not fit well to model A. Although it fits reasonably well to model B for the 20% and 35% GC DNA, the 50% and 65% GC DNA data do not fit well to the model. ( C) The best fits were obtained with model C. ( D) The fitting was performed using SigmaPlot. The derivation of equations used in the fitting is shown in the Appendix—Section 3. The K m, dTTP was fixed at 90 μM in the fitting based on the K m, dTTP for the helicase when translocating on ssDNA substrate (Appendix—Section 4). The k cat was fixed at 130 nt/s corresponding to the ssDNA translocation rate of the helicase. DOI:
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.. Pi release kinetics.
Burst Rate of Pi release plotted as a function of dTTP to obtain the
K m, dTTP in the presence of dT 90 ssDNA. The error represents fitting error. DOI:
Figure 3.. The kinetics of DNA unwinding by the combined helicase and DNAP enzymes.
A) The replication fork DNA substrate and representative kinetic trace of DNA unwinding by the combined T7 DNAP and T7 helicase enzymes. ( B) The base pair unwinding rates of the combined enzymes at 5 µM dVTPs plotted against dTTP concentrations and fit to Equation 4 (solid lines) to obtain the maximal rate of unwinding ( k cat) and K m for dTTP. ( C, D) The unwinding k cat and dTTP K m as a function of GC percentages. ( E) The unwinding rates of the isolated helicase (red circles) and helicase-DNAP (green circles) were measured using the 50% GC fork at constant 5 μM dVTP and increasing dTTP concentrations. ( F) The unwinding rates of the isolated helicase (red circle) and helicase-DNAP (green circle) were measured using the 50% GC fork at 50 μM dVTP concentrations and increasing dTTP concentrations. ( G) The unwinding rates of T7 DNAP with E. coli SSB (red circle) or with T7 helicase (green circle) were measured using the 50% GC fork at 500 μM dTTP and increasing dNTPs concentrations. DOI:
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. Unwinding-synthesis trace for helicase-DNAP.
A) Representative trace showing time course of unwinding-synthesis by the helicase–polymerase on the 20% GC and 50% GC DNA substrate at 100 μM dTTP and 5 μM dVTP. The dip in signal is more prominent with the 50% GC DNA substrate compared to the 20% GC DNA substrate. This suggests that the first and second phase could represent the coupled and uncoupled activities of the helicase-DNAP, respectively. ( B) Representative trace showing time course of unwinding by the helicase at 500 μM dTTP on the 20% GC DNA. The presence of the dip in the helicase only reaction suggests that interaction of helicase with the fluorescein leads to a dip in the fluorescence signal once the strands are unwound. Together, these data indicate that the dip in the fluorescence signal could be due to (i) helicase interaction with the fluorescein and (ii) coupled and uncoupled activities of the helicase-DNAP. DOI:
Figure 4.. Functionally coupled and uncoupled helicase-DNAP.
A) The unwinding rates of the combined helicase-DNAP were measured at 50 µM dTTP (red circle) or 500 µM dTTP (green circle) at increasing dVTPs concentration on the 50% GC fork. The bar chart shows the unwinding k cat and dVTPs K m of the combined enzymes at low- (grey bars) and high-dTTP (black bars) concentrations. The cartoon shows that the enzymes remain functionally coupled when helicase is the slow motor. ( B) The unwinding rates of the combined enzymes (green circles) at zero dVTPs concentration are compared to the rates of helicase alone (red circles) at increasing dTTP concentrations on the 50% GC fork. The bar charts compare the unwinding k cat and dTTP K m of helicase-DNAP (black) and isolated helicase (gray). Error bars represent fitting errors. The cartoon show that stalling DNAP leads to functional uncoupling between helicase-DNAP with or without physical uncoupling. ( C) The DNA unwinding rates of the isolated helicase and helicase-DNAP were measured at 1 mM dTTP and 0.5 µM dVTPs on the 20% GC fork. The bar chart shows the unwinding rate of the isolated helicase (light gray), helicase-DNAP complex (dark gray), and the predicted rate of DNA synthesis by helicase-DNAP assuming coupled synthesis (black). DOI:
Figure 5.. Base pair melting by isolated and combined T7 DNAP and T7 helicase using 2-aminopurine fluorescence changes.
A) Structure of the 2-aminopurine (2-AP):T base pair. ( B) Structure of the replication fork substrate for 2-AP studies. The primer-end is N and subsequent base pairs are N + 1, N + 2, etc. The substrates contained a single 2-AP in the leading or the lagging strand. The primer-end is next to the junction base pair as shown or separated by gaps of one to three template strand nucleotides (not shown). ( C) Crystal structure of T7 DNAP bound to primer-template DNA substrate (PDB: 2AJQ). The N + 1 base (blue) is bound in the insertion site, and the N + 2 and N + 3 bases are bound in the template-binding channel. The figure was made using PyMOL (Schrodinger, 2010). ( D) Fluorescence intensities of 2-AP modified primer-template substrate without (blue) and with T7 DNAP (green). The 2-AP probe is shown in red at the indicated positions. ( E– H) Fluorescence intensities of 2-AP modified replication fork substrates with and without T7 DNAP and T7 helicase. The cartoons show the structure of fork DNA before and after binding of combined T7 DNAP and T7 helicase enzymes. Errors shown are standard deviations from average of 2–5 experiments. DOI:
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Determining optimal conditions for T7 DNAP and extent of influence of T7 DNAP on template bases in replication fork substrate.
A) Effect of increasing ratio of the T7 DNAP processivity factor thioredoxin on the 2-AP fluorescence signal. A final ratio of 1:2.5 was used in all the experiments. ( B) Effect of DNAP concentration on fluorescence emission of 2-AP in the +1 lag 1 gap substrate. Final enzyme concentration of 200 nM was used in all experiments. ( C) Sample fluorescence intensity trace showing the effect of T7 DNAP binding to No gap replication fork DNA. The 2-AP intensity at 370 nm was used in all experiments. ( D) Fluorescence intensities of replication fork DNAs with 2-AP at various indicated positions in the leading strand with and without T7 DNAP. DOI:
Figure 5—figure supplement 2.. Effect of T7 DNAP on 2-AP at the junction at N + 2 and N + 3.
A and B) Fluorescence intensities of fork DNA with 2-AP part of the junction base pair at A. N + 2 and B. N + 3 positions in the lagging strand with and without T7 DNAP. The cartoons show the structure of fork DNA before and after binding of T7 DNAP. DOI:
Figure 5—figure supplement 3.. Base pair melting by combined SSB—DNAP using 2-AP fluorescence change.
Fluorescence intensities of 2-AP modified replication fork substrates with and without T7 DNAP and
E. coli SSB. The cartoons show the structure of fork DNA before and after binding of combined T7 DNAP and E. coli SSB enzymes. Each experiment had 100 nM DNA, 200 nM DNAP, and 200 nM SSB (tetramer). DOI:
Figure 5—figure supplement 4.. Determining optimal conditions for T7 helicase.
A) Effect of helicase concentration on fluorescence emission of 2-AP in the +1 lag 1 gap substrate. Final enzyme concentration of 200 nM was used in all experiments. ( B) Fold change on helicase binding to short 8 nt ssDNA substrates with probe at positions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 from the 5′ end. Error bars represent instrument fluctuations. ( C) Sample fluorescence intensity trace showing the effect of helicase binding to No gap replication fork DNA. The 2-AP intensity at 370 nm was used in all experiments. DOI:
Figure 5—figure supplement 5.. (
A– C) Fluorescence intensities of fork DNA with 2-AP in the lagging strand at the fork junction and increasing distance between primer end and fork junction with (red bars) and without T7 helicase (blue bars).
The cartoons show the structure of fork DNA before and after binding of T7 helicase. The numbers above the bar refer to fold change of 2-AP intensity on protein binding to the DNA. (
D) Fluorescence intensities of 2-AP modified fork substrates with and without T7 Helicase and E. coli SSB. The cartoons show the structure of fork DNA before and after binding of combined T7 Helicase and E. coli SSB enzymes. Fork substrates with two single-stranded DNA overhangs were used in the experiments with SSB and helicase to provide a binding site for both enzymes on opposite strands. DOI:
Figure 6.. Proposed model of DNA unwinding-synthesis by T7 replisome.
The top cartoon of T7 replisome results after melting of the N + 2 base pair by helicase and DNAP. There are two unwound nucleotides (N + 1 and N + 2) between the primer-end and fork junction at N + 3. The N + 1 base of the leading strand is bound in the insertion site and serves as the templating nucleotide for the incoming dNTP, and the N + 2 is unstacked and bound in the template-binding channel of the DNAP. The complementary N + 1 and N + 2 nucleotides (as well as N and N − 1) on the lagging strand are bound to individual subunits of the helicase hexamer, as shown. Stable binding to N + 2 base by the helicase triggers dTTP hydrolysis and products release at different subunits of the ring. The helicase subunit at the leading edge has weak interactions with the partially unwound N + 3 junction base (dotted line), which gets stabilized after the next round of catalysis. When N is elongated by one nucleotide, the N + 2 moves into the insertion site after PPi release, and the helicase and DNAP cooperatively melt the N + 3 junction base pair, as shown in the bottom cartoon. This model explains the one-nucleotide step size where the combined enzymes translocate by one nucleotide for every dTTP hydrolyzed and nucleotide incorporated (Pandey and Patel, 2014).
Author response image 1.
All figures (22)
Methods to study the coupling between replicative helicase and leading-strand DNA polymerase at the replication fork.
Methods. 2016 Oct 1;108:65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 9.
27173619 Free PMC article.
Helicase and polymerase move together close to the fork junction and copy DNA in one-nucleotide steps.
Cell Rep. 2014 Mar 27;6(6):1129-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
Cell Rep. 2014.
24630996 Free PMC article.
A complex of the bacteriophage T7 primase-helicase and DNA polymerase directs primer utilization.
J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 15;276(24):21809-20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101470200. Epub 2001 Mar 28.
J Biol Chem. 2001.
Mechanisms of a ring shaped helicase.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(15):4216-24. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl508. Epub 2006 Aug 25.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006.
16935879 Free PMC article.
ATP-induced helicase slippage reveals highly coordinated subunits.
Nature. 2011 Sep 18;478(7367):132-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10409.
21927003 Free PMC article.
Excessive excision of correct nucleotides during DNA synthesis explained by replication hurdles.
EMBO J. 2020 Mar 16;39(6):e103367. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019103367. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
EMBO J. 2020.
32037587 Free PMC article.
Different mechanisms for translocation by monomeric and hexameric helicases.
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020 Apr;61:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020.
Dynamics of the Eukaryotic Replicative Helicase at Lagging-Strand Protein Barriers Support the Steric Exclusion Model.
Cell Rep. 2019 Feb 19;26(8):2113-2125.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.086.
Cell Rep. 2019.
30784593 Free PMC article.
Structures and operating principles of the replisome.
Science. 2019 Feb 22;363(6429):eaav7003. doi: 10.1126/science.aav7003. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
30679383 Free PMC article.
Helicase promotes replication re-initiation from an RNA transcript.
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 13;9(1):2306. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04702-x.
Nat Commun. 2018.
29899338 Free PMC article.
Ali JA, Lohman TM. Kinetic measurement of the step size of DNA unwinding by Escherichia coli UvrD helicase. Science. 1997;275:377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.377.
Berman AJ, Kamtekar S, Goodman JL, Lazaro JM, de Vega M, Blanco L, Salas M, Steitz TA. Structures of phi29 DNA polymerase complexed with substrate: the mechanism of translocation in B-family polymerases. The EMBO Journal. 2007;26:3494–3505. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601780.
Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee MC, Walter JC, Cimprich KA. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes & Development. 2005;19:1040–1052. doi: 10.1101/gad.1301205.
Costa A, Renault L, Swuec P, Petojevic T, Pesavento JJ, Ilves I, MacLellan-Gibson K, Fleck RA, Botchan MR, Berger JM. DNA binding polarity, dimerization, and ATPase ring remodeling in the CMG helicase of the eukaryotic replisome. eLife. 2014;3:e03273. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03273.
Crampton DJ, Mukherjee S, Richardson CC. DNA-induced switch from independent to sequential dTTP hydrolysis in the bacteriophage T7 DNA helicase. Molecular Cell. 2006;21:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.027.
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
DNA Helicases / metabolism
DNA Primase / metabolism*
DNA Replication / physiology*
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase / metabolism*
Nucleic Acid Denaturation / genetics*
Oligonucleotides / genetics
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources Other Literature Sources