Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 12;7(5):1649-63.
doi: 10.3390/toxins7051649.

Spatial and temporal patterns in the seasonal distribution of toxic cyanobacteria in Western Lake Erie from 2002-2014

Affiliations

Spatial and temporal patterns in the seasonal distribution of toxic cyanobacteria in Western Lake Erie from 2002-2014

Timothy T Wynne et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Lake Erie, the world's tenth largest freshwater lake by area, has had recurring blooms of toxic cyanobacteria for the past two decades. These blooms pose potential health risks for recreation, and impact the treatment of drinking water. Understanding the timing and distribution of the blooms may aid in planning by local communities and resources managers. Satellite data provides a means of examining spatial patterns of the blooms. Data sets from MERIS (2002-2012) and MODIS (2012-2014) were analyzed to evaluate bloom patterns and frequencies. The blooms were identified using previously published algorithms to detect cyanobacteria (~25,000 cells mL-1), as well as a variation of these algorithms to account for the saturation of the MODIS ocean color bands. Images were binned into 10-day composites to reduce cloud and mixing artifacts. The 13 years of composites were used to determine frequency of presence of both detectable cyanobacteria and high risk (>100,000 cells mL-1) blooms. The bloom season according to the satellite observations falls within June 1 and October 31. Maps show the pattern of development and areas most commonly impacted during all years (with minor and severe blooms). Frequencies during years with just severe blooms (minor bloom years were not included in the analysis) were examined in the same fashion. With the annual forecasts of bloom severity, these frequency maps can provide public water suppliers and health departments with guidance on the timing of potential risk.

Keywords: Lake Erie; MERIS; MODIS; blue-green algae; cyanobacteria; ecological forecasting; harmful algae; remote sensing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study area and geographic features described in the text.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Location of Lake Erie municipal water intakes lettered as following: T = Toledo PWS; M = Monroe; C = Carroll Water and Sewer; O = Ottawa County Regional; P = Put-In-Bay Village PWS; MH = Marblehead Village PWS; U = Union.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The average Cyanobacterial Index concentration of the 13 years (log scaled) for each 10-day period. Cell concentration can be estimated from the CI by Cells (mL−1) = 108 × CI [1]. CI > 0.001 exceeds the WHO [6] threshold of 105 cells mL−1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The 13-year average of the area and biomass in Lake Erie flagged by the satellite imagery for each 10-day period (0611 is June 11, etc.). Area is shown in blue, accumulated biomass is shown in black. The biomass is the accumulated biomass across the entire lake following previously published methods [1]. 1 CI is nominally 1020 cells. This is integrated spatially, thereby corresponding to biomass.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The spatial pattern (by pixel) of percentage frequency of detectable cyanobacteria. Analysis for each 10-day period during all years from 2002–2014.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The spatial pattern of percentage frequency of severe cyanobacteria (>105 cells mL−1, CI > 0.001) for each 10-day period during all years from 2002–2014.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Same as Figure 5 for only years with blooms (percentage frequency of detectable cyanobacteria).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Same as Figure 6 for only years with blooms (percentage frequency of severe cyanobacteria).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Frequency of severe blooms during the 2002–2014 record at the approximate location of selected water treatment intakes from Figure 2. Except for Toledo station (station 1), the data from the other stations were taken 2 pixels (~2 km) into the center of the lake to obtain valid data without land contamination or masking.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stumpf R.P., Wynne T.T., Baker D.B., Fahnenstiel G.L. Interannual variability of cyanobacterial blooms in Lake Erie. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042444. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [(accessed on 16 March 2015)]; Available online: http://www2.nccos.noaa.gov/coast/lakeerie/bulletin/
    1. Backer L.C. Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (CyanoHABs): developing a public health response. Lake Reserv. Manag. 2002;18:20–31. doi: 10.1080/07438140209353926. - DOI
    1. Davenport T., Drake W. Grand Lake St. Marys, Ohio—The Case for Source Water Protection: Nutrients And Algae Blooms, EPA Commentary. [(accessed on 4 March 2015)]; Available online: http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/upload/lakeline_article.pdf.
    1. Henry T. Carrol Township’s scare with toxin a “wake-up call”. Toledo Blade. 2013 Sep 15;

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources