Alterations in the Elasticity, Pliability, and Viscoelastic Properties of Facial Skin After Injection of Onabotulinum Toxin A
- PMID: 25996589
- DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0376
Alterations in the Elasticity, Pliability, and Viscoelastic Properties of Facial Skin After Injection of Onabotulinum Toxin A
Abstract
Importance: This prospective cohort study provides evidence and information on the mechanism of action of onabotulinum toxin A on the reduction of skin elasticity and pliability. Understanding the natural course that onabotulinum toxin A has on the elasticity of skin may help physicians understand why there appears to be a progressive reduction in wrinkle levels with repeated treatments.
Objective: To determine whether onabotulinum toxin A increases skin pliability and elasticity with a corresponding decrease in the contribution of the viscoelastic component of skin resistance.
Design, setting, and participants: From October 1, 2012, through June 31, 2013, this prospective cohort study enrolled 48 onabotulinum toxin A-naive women (mean [SD] age, 55.2 [11.3] years) with a minimum of mild wrinkle levels at the glabella and lateral orbit (43 completed the study). Patients were treated at a private cosmetic surgery clinic with onabotulinum toxin A and assessed at baseline and 2 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, and 4 months after injection.
Interventions: Standardized onabotulinum toxin A was administered to patients' glabella, supraorbit, and lateral orbit.
Main outcomes and measures: Skin pliability, elastic recoil, and the ratio of viscoelastic resistance (Uv) to elastic resistance (Ue).
Results: For the supraorbit, there was a significant effect of time on pliability (F = 20.5), elastic recoil (F = 6.92), and Uv/Ue ratio (F = 5.6) (P < .001 for all). For the glabella, there was a significant effect of time on pliability (F = 32.23), elastic recoil (F = 31.66), and Uv/Ue ratio (F = 10.11) (P < .001 for all). For the lateral orbit, there was a significant effect of time on pliability (F = 15.83, P < .001), elastic recoil (F = 11.43, P < .001), and Uv/Ue ratio (F = 10.60, P = .009).
Conclusions and relevance: This study provides further evidence that there is an alteration in biomechanical properties of the skin after injection with onabotulinum toxin A. This effect appears to last up to 4 months in the glabella and up to 3 months at other sites. The decrease in the Uv/Ue ratio suggests onabotulinum toxin A injection does not result in an increase in tissue edema suggestive of an inflammatory reaction within the skin. However, it remains unclear whether this is due to an intrinsic property of the medication or another unrecognized mechanism.
Level of evidence: 2.
Comment in
-
Furthering the Understanding of Actions of Botulinum Toxin A.JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(4):263-4. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0567. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 25996497 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Skin Biomechanical Changes after Injection of Onabotulinum Toxin A: Prospective Assessment of Elasticity and Pliability.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jun;150(6):949-55. doi: 10.1177/0194599814526558. Epub 2014 Mar 24. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014. PMID: 24664544
-
Electromyographic differences between normal upper and lower facial muscles and the influence of onabotulinum toxin a.JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 May;15(3):211-7. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.692. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23430072 Clinical Trial.
-
Alteration of Skin Mechanical Properties in Patients Undergoing Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections of Forehead Rhytides.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;40(3):410-20. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0629-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 26944891 Clinical Trial.
-
Italian consensus report on the aesthetic use of onabotulinum toxin A.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Oct;17(5):719-730. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12729. Epub 2018 Aug 9. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 30091253
-
Botulinum toxin: examining duration of effect in facial aesthetic applications.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010;11(3):183-99. doi: 10.2165/11530110-000000000-00000. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20369902 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing aesthetic outcomes: The role of biomechanics in periorbital and eyelid cosmetic surgery.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 1;72(10):1424-1432. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1549_23. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39331432 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Botulinum neurotoxins: Future innovations.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 1;102(S1):e32378. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032378. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37499089 Free PMC article.
-
Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) mechanism of action.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 1;102(S1):e32372. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032372. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37499078 Free PMC article.
-
Incobotulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Ultraviolet-B-Induced Hyperpigmentation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;14(6):417. doi: 10.3390/toxins14060417. Toxins (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35737078 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Personal Technique of Microinfiltration With Botulin Toxin: The SINB Technique (Superficial Injection Needling Botulinum).Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019 May;27(2):156-161. doi: 10.1177/2292550318800330. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019. PMID: 31106174 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials