Assessing health-care providers' readiness for reporting quality and patient safety indicators at primary health-care centres in Lebanon: a national cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 25997430
- PMCID: PMC4450474
- DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0031-5
Assessing health-care providers' readiness for reporting quality and patient safety indicators at primary health-care centres in Lebanon: a national cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Background: Successful endorsement of quality indicators hinges on the readiness and acceptability of care providers for those measures. This paper aims to assess the readiness of care providers in the primary health-care sector in Lebanon for the implementation of quality and patient safety indicators.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey methodology was utilized to gather information from 943 clinical care providers working at 123 primary health-care centres in Lebanon. The questionnaire included two sections: the first assessed four readiness dimensions (appropriateness, management support, efficacy, and personal valence) of clinical providers to use quality and safety indicators using the Readiness for Organization Change (ROC) scale, and the second section assessed the safety attitude at the primary care centre utilizing the Agency of Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ)-Ambulatory version.
Results: Although two thirds (66%) of respondents indicated readiness for implementation of quality and patient safety indicators in their centres, there appear to be differences by professional group. Physicians displayed the lowest scores on all readiness dimensions except for personal valence which was the lowest among nurses (60%). In contrast, allied health professionals displayed the highest scores across all readiness dimensions. Generally, respondents reflected a positive safety attitude climate in the centres. Yet, there remain a few areas of concern related to punitive culture (only 12.8% agree that staff should not be punished for reported errors/incidents), continuity of care (41.1% believe in the negative consequences of lack in continuity of care process), and resources (48.1% believe that the medical equipment they have are adequate). Providers with the highest SAQ score had 2.7, 1.7, 7 and 2.4 times the odds to report a higher readiness on the appropriateness, efficacy, management and personal valence ROC subscales, respectively (P value <0.01). Nurses displayed relatively lower odds of readiness across all other ROC subscales as compared to all other providers.
Conclusion: Health-care providers at the primary health care (PHC) centres in Lebanon are ready to engage in employing quality and patient safety indicators. This is a key finding given the active efforts by the MoPH to strengthen the quality culture in the PHC sector through various strategies.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Readiness of healthcare providers for eHealth: the case from primary healthcare centers in Lebanon.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1896-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27832788 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the job satisfaction of healthcare providers at primary healthcare centres in Lebanon: A national cross-sectional study.Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Nov;25(6):1805-1816. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12454. Epub 2017 Jun 18. Health Soc Care Community. 2017. PMID: 28627051
-
Patient safety culture in out-of-hours primary care services in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426150. Epub 2018 Jan 15. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018. PMID: 29334826 Free PMC article.
-
Organizational e-Health Readiness: How to Prepare the Primary Healthcare Providers' Services for Digital Transformation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 27;19(7):3973. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073973. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35409656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measurement tools and process indicators of patient safety culture in primary care. A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):26-30. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043732. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015. PMID: 26339832 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
International students' perceived quality of university health centre services: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Sep 20;25:e39. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000288. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024. PMID: 39301603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Safety Domains in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024 Jan;34(1):73-84. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.9. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024. PMID: 38957341 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review: application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in primary care - a systematic synthesis on validity, descriptive and comparative results, and variance across organisational units.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 25;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02273-z. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38273241 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. Declaration of the Alma-Ata: international conference on primary health care. 1978.
-
- WHO. The World Health Report 2008 - primary health care (now more than ever). 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
