An economic evaluation of outpatient versus inpatient polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding

BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):625-31. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13434. Epub 2015 May 25.

Abstract

Objectives: To undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis of outpatient uterine polypectomy compared with standard inpatient treatment under general anaesthesia.

Design: Economic evaluation carried out alongside the multi-centre, pragmatic, non-inferiority, randomised controlled Outpatient Polyp Treatment (OPT) trial. The UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective was used in the estimation of costs and the interpretation of results.

Setting: Thirty-one secondary care UK NHS hospitals between April 2008 and July 2011.

Participants: Five hundred and seven women with abnormal uterine bleeding and hysteroscopically diagnosed endometrial polyps.

Interventions: Outpatient uterine polypectomy versus standard inpatient treatment. Clinicians were free to choose the technique for polypectomy within the allocated setting.

Main outcome measures: Patient-reported effectiveness of the procedure determined by the women's self-assessment of bleeding at 6 months, and QALY gains at 6 and 12 months.

Results: Inpatient treatment was slightly more effective but more expensive than outpatient treatment, resulting in relatively high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Intention-to-treat analysis of the base case at 6 months revealed that it cost an additional £9421 per successfully treated patient in the inpatient group and £ 1,099,167 per additional QALY gained, when compared with outpatient treatment. At 12 months, these costs were £22,293 per additional effectively treated patient and £445,867 per additional QALY gained, respectively.

Conclusions: Outpatient treatment of uterine polyps associated with abnormal uterine bleeding appears to be more cost-effective than inpatient treatment at willingness-to-pay thresholds acceptable to the NHS.

Tweetable abstract: HTA-funded OPT trial concluded that outpatient uterine polypectomy is cost-effective compared with inpatient polypectomy.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Outpatient Polyp Treatment trial; endometrial polyps; hysteroscopy; inpatient; outpatient.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care / economics*
  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / economics*
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Hospitalization / economics
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Inpatients*
  • Outpatients*
  • Patient Preference
  • Polyps / complications
  • Polyps / economics*
  • Polyps / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / economics*
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / surgery