Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database
- PMID: 26020842
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000987
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database
Abstract
Study design: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Objective: To investigate national trends, risks, and benefits of surgical interventions for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).
Summary of background data: The surgical management of DS continues to evolve whereas the most clinically and cost-effective treatment is debated. With an aging US population and growing restraints on a financially burdened health care system, a clear understanding of national trends in the surgical management of DS is needed.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients with DS undergoing lumbar fusions from 2001 to 2010, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis and procedure codes. Analyses compared instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), posterolateral fusion with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF + PLF), PLF with posterior interbody fusion (P/TLIF + PLF), anterior instrumented interbody fusion (ALIF), and posterior interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation (P/TLIF). Clinical data were analyzed representing the initial acute phase care after surgery.
Results: There were 48,911 DS surgical procedures identified, representing 237,383 procedures. The percentage of patients undergoing PLF, ALIF + PLF, or ALIF increased whereas the percentage of P/TLIF or P/TLIF + PLF decreased over time. Total charges were less (P < 0.001), average length of hospital stay was shorter (P < 0.01), and average age was older (P < 0.01) for patients who underwent PLF compared with any other procedure. Type of procedure varied on the basis of the geographic region of the hospital, teaching versus nonteaching hospital, and size of hospital (P < 0.01). Patients who had P/TLIF + PLF or ALIF had a higher risk of mortality than patients who had PLF (odds ratios: 5.02, 2.22, respectively). Patients were more likely to develop a complication if they had ALIF + PLF, P/TLIF + PLF, ALIF, and P/TLIF than if they had PLF (odds ratios: 1.45, 1.23, 1.49, 1.12, respectively).
Conclusion: Variation in the surgical management of DS related to patient demographics, hospital charges, length of hospital stay, insurance type, comorbidities, and complication rates was found within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. During the acute phase of care immediately after surgery, PLF procedures were found to reduce length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and postoperative complications.
Level of evidence: 3.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.050. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24333459
-
The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 13. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25463402
-
Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;138:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 20. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26318363
-
A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1911-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x. Epub 2023 Apr 18. Eur Spine J. 2023. PMID: 37071155 Review.
-
A Systematic Review of Lumbar Fusion Rates With and Without the Use of rhBMP-2.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):1132-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000971. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. PMID: 25955186 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical changes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion with different fixation techniques in degenerative spondylolisthesis lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07796-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39182026 Free PMC article.
-
Are the facet joint parameters risk factors for cage subsidence after TLIF in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis?Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3523-3533. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08393-5. Epub 2024 Jul 5. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38967801
-
Comparison between modified facet joint fusion and posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective study.BMC Surg. 2022 Jan 28;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01468-4. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 35090435 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Practice Variation Research in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Surgery: A Literature Review on Design Characteristics and Outcomes.Global Spine J. 2022 Oct;12(8):1841-1851. doi: 10.1177/21925682211064855. Epub 2021 Dec 27. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 34955052 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 11;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04022-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 33573634 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
