Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 1;27(4):585-597.

Response-Outcome versus Outcome-Response Associations in Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer: Effects of Instrumental Training Context

Affiliations

Response-Outcome versus Outcome-Response Associations in Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer: Effects of Instrumental Training Context

Kerry E Gilroy et al. Int J Comp Psychol. .

Abstract

One experiment with rats used Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) tests to explore potential competitive interactions between Pavlovian and instrumental processes during instrumental learning. Two instrumental response-outcome relations (e.g., left lever - grain pellets, right lever - sucrose pellets) were first trained in distinct contexts for one group of rats (Group Differential) or in each of two contexts for a second group (Group Non-Differential). Both of these groups then received training with two Pavlovian stimulus-outcome relations in a third experimental context. Selective PIT tests conducted in both the Pavlovian and instrumental contexts revealed greater selective PIT in Group Non-Differential than in Group Differential subjects. This result is discussed in terms of the roles played by context-outcome, response-outcome, and outcome-response associations during instrumental learning. The results further help us understand the nature of Pavlovian-instrumental interactions in specific PIT tasks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean elevation scores during the choice tests conducted in the Pavlovian training context for responses to the same and different (Diff) lever by animals in Group Differential (GP D) and Group Non-Differential (Gp NonD). Error bars show +/− 1 SEM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean elevation scores during choice tests conducted in the instrumental training contexts. Data are shown separately when “same” responses were tested in their retrieved and non-retrieved contexts for animals in Group Differential, and in both contexts combined for Group Non-Differential. Error bars show +/− 1 SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balleine BW, Killcross S. Parallel incentive processing: an integrated view of amygdala function. Trends in Neuroscience. 2006;29:272–279. - PubMed
    1. Barnet RC, Miller RR. Second-order excitation mediated by a backward conditioned inhibitor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 1996;22:279–296. - PubMed
    1. Berridge KC. ‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ food rewards: Brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiology & Behavior. 2009;97:537–550. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Hatton SR, Haddon JE, George DN, Honey RC. Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer: paradoxical effects of the Pavlovian relationship explained. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 2013;39:14–23. - PubMed
    1. Colwill RM, Rescorla RA. Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforce affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 1985;11:120–132.