Variability in utilization of drug eluting stents in United States: Insights from nationwide inpatient sample
- PMID: 26032938
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25977
Variability in utilization of drug eluting stents in United States: Insights from nationwide inpatient sample
Abstract
Objectives: We studied the trends and predictors of drug eluting stent (DES) utilization from 2006 to 2011 to further expound the inter-hospital variability in their utilization.
Background: We queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2006 and 2011 using ICD-9-CM procedure code, 36.06 (bare metal stent) or 36.07 (drug eluting stents) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Annual hospital volume was calculated using unique identification numbers and divided into quartiles for analysis.
Methods and results: We built a hierarchical two level model adjusted for multiple confounding factors, with hospital ID incorporated as random effects in the model. About 665,804 procedures (weighted n = 3,277,884) were analyzed. Safety concerns arising in 2006 reduced utilization DES from 90% of all PCIs performed in 2006 to a nadir of 69% in 2008 followed by increase (76% of all stents in 2009) and plateau (75% in 2011). Significant between-hospital variation was noted in DES utilization irrespective of patient or hospital characteristics. Independent patient level predictors of DES were (OR, 95% CI, P-value) age (0.99, 0.98-0.99, <0.001), female(1.12, 1.09-1.15, <0.001), acute myocardial infarction(0.75, 0.71-0.79, <0.001), shock (0.53, 0.49-0.58, <0.001), Charlson Co-morbidity index (0.81,0.77-0.86, <0.001), private insurance/HMO (1.27, 1.20-1.34, <0.001), and elective admission (1.16, 1.05-1.29, <0.001). Highest quartile hospital (1.64, 1.25-2.16, <0.001) volume was associated with higher DES placement.
Conclusion: There is significant between-hospital variation in DES utilization and a higher annual hospital volume is associated with higher utilization rate of DES. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: bare metal stent; coronary artery disease; drug eluting stent; health care outcomes.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Impact on in-hospital outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (from 665,804 procedures).Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 1;114(11):1629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.033. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25439448
-
Variation in utilization of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: influence of hospital volume.Coron Artery Dis. 2015 Dec;26(8):657-64. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000298. Coron Artery Dis. 2015. PMID: 26340544
-
The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):360-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12160. Cardiovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 26363283 Review.
-
In-hospital and one year outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in large native coronary arteries: a report from the Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events registry.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):E356-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24451. Epub 2013 May 25. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 22511502
-
Very late stent thrombosis with second generation drug eluting stents compared to bare metal stents: Network meta-analysis of randomized primary percutaneous coronary intervention trials.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;88(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26458. Epub 2016 Feb 24. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26916633 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
