A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
- PMID: 26038660
- PMCID: PMC4439856
- DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.156847
A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading.
Material and methods: The three-dimensional (3D) finite element program (ANSYS software) was used to construct the mathematical model. Two 5-unit FPD'S were simulated, one with rigid connector and another one with nonrigid connector. For analysis, each of these models were subjected to axial and oblique forces under progressive loading (180, 180, 120, 120, 80 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively) and simultaneous loading (100, 100, 100, 100, 100 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively).
Results: The rigid and nonrigid connector design have effect on stress distribution in 5-unit FPDs with pier abutments.
Conclusion: Oblique forces produce more stresses than vertical forces. Nonrigid connector resulted in decrease in stress at the level of prosthesis and increase in stress at the level of alveolar crest.
Keywords: Connectors; finite element analysis; pier abutment; stress distribution; tooth supported.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Effect of Connector Designs in Implant Tooth-supported Fixed Partial Denture: A Two-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):669-674. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018. PMID: 29959294
-
Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Mar;99(3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60042-6. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18319089
-
Stress Distribution in 5-Unit Fixed Partial Dentures with a Pier Abutment and Rigid and Nonrigid Connectors with Two Different Occlusal Schemes: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.Int J Dent. 2023 Feb 1;2023:3347197. doi: 10.1155/2023/3347197. eCollection 2023. Int J Dent. 2023. PMID: 36778158 Free PMC article.
-
Tooth-implant connection: a review.J Oral Implantol. 2012 Apr;38(2):194-200. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00071. Epub 2010 Nov 23. J Oral Implantol. 2012. PMID: 21091344 Review.
-
The cantilever fixed partial denture--a literature review.J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Apr;67(4):484-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90077-n. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. PMID: 1507130 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Aug 29;10:928656. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.928656. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36105608 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Stress Acting on Abutment, Bone, and Connector of Different Designs of Acid-Etched Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures: Finite Element Analysis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 26;10:798988. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.798988. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35557860 Free PMC article.
-
Fracture Resistance and Fracture Behaviour of Monolithic Multi-Layered Translucent Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Placing Strategies of Connector: An in vitro Study.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022 Mar 22;14:61-69. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S344941. eCollection 2022. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022. PMID: 35345450 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of frictional resistance of extracoronal attachments of different designs and lengths in fixed partial denture: A finite element analysis.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):99-105. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_463_19. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021. PMID: 33835074 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of using different bridge prosthetic designs for partial defect restoration through mathematical modeling.Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):345-351. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_72_17. Eur J Dent. 2017. PMID: 28932145 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Oruc S, Eraslan O, Tukay HA, Atay A. Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:185–92. - PubMed
-
- Badwaik PV, Pakhan AJ. Non-rigid connectors in fixed prosthodontics: Current concepts with a case report. J Indian Prosthet Soc. 2005;5:99–102.
-
- Savion I, Saucier CL, Rues S, Sadan A, Blatz M. The pier abutment: A review of the literature and a suggested mathematical model. Quintessence Int. 2006;37:345–52. - PubMed
-
- Shillingburg HT, Jr, Fisher DW. Nonrigid connectors for fixed partial dentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;87:1195–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
