Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 6;2(5):150054.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.150054. eCollection 2015 May.

Polygyny without wealth: popularity in gift games predicts polygyny in BaYaka Pygmies

Affiliations

Polygyny without wealth: popularity in gift games predicts polygyny in BaYaka Pygmies

Nikhil Chaudhary et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

The occurrence of polygynous marriage in hunter-gatherer societies, which do not accumulate wealth, remains largely unexplored since resource availability is dependent on male hunting capacity and limited by the lack of storage. Hunter-gatherer societies offer the greatest insight in to human evolution since they represent the majority of our species' evolutionary history. In order to elucidate the evolution of hunter-gatherer polygyny, we study marriage patterns of BaYaka Pygmies. We investigate (i) rates of polygyny among BaYaka hunter-gatherers; (ii) whether polygyny confers a fitness benefit to BaYaka men; (iii) in the absence of wealth inequalities, what are the alternative explanations for polygyny among the BaYaka. To understand the latter, we explore differences in phenotypic quality (height and strength), and social capital (popularity in gift games). We find polygynous men have increased reproductive fitness; and that social capital and popularity but not phenotypic quality might have been important mechanisms by which some male hunter-gatherers sustained polygynous marriages before the onset of agriculture and wealth accumulation.

Keywords: genetic quality; hunter–gatherers; polygyny; social capital; social networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scatter plot and regression lines of number of currently living offspring by age rank. Purple squares/line are polygynous individuals and blue circles/line are non-polygynous individuals.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Boxplot comparing gift game in-degree z-scores of polygynous and non-polygynous men. Z-scores are standardized by camp, to allow simultaneous comparison of social capital of men from all camps by controlling for camp size. Hollow circles represent outliers. Sample sizes are indicated in parentheses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee R, Daly R. 1999. The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Cashdan E. 1980. Egalitarianism among hunters and gatherers. Am. Anthropol 82, 116–120. (doi:10.1525/aa.1980.82.1.02a00100) - DOI
    1. Endicott K. 1990. Gender relations in hunter–gatherer societies. In The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers (eds Lee R, Daly R), pp. 411–418. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Hartung J. 1982. Polygyny and inheritance of wealth. Curr. Anthropol 23, 1–12. (doi:10.1086/202775) - DOI
    1. Marlowe F. 2000. Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behav. Process. 51, 45–61. (doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00118-2) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources