A comparison of two methods for measuring vessel length in woody plants

Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Dec;38(12):2519-26. doi: 10.1111/pce.12566. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Abstract

Vessel lengths are important to plant hydraulic studies, but are not often reported because of the time required to obtain measurements. This paper compares the fast dynamic method (air injection method) with the slower but traditional static method (rubber injection method). Our hypothesis was that the dynamic method should yield a larger mean vessel length than the static method. Vessel length was measured by both methods in current year stems of Acer, Populus, Vitis and Quercus representing short- to long-vessel species. The hypothesis was verified. The reason for the consistently larger values of vessel length is because the dynamic method measures air flow rates in cut open vessels. The Hagen-Poiseuille law predicts that the air flow rate should depend on the product of number of cut open vessels times the fourth power of vessel diameter. An argument is advanced that the dynamic method is more appropriate because it measures the length of the vessels that contribute most to hydraulic flow. If all vessels had the same vessel length distribution regardless of diameter, then both methods should yield the same average length. This supports the hypothesis that large-diameter vessels might be longer than short-diameter vessels in most species.

Keywords: Reynolds number; air injection method; pneumatic flow; rubber injection method; turbulence; vessel length distribution.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acer / anatomy & histology*
  • Plant Stems / anatomy & histology
  • Populus / anatomy & histology*
  • Quercus / anatomy & histology*
  • Vitis / anatomy & histology*
  • Wood / anatomy & histology