National rates and risk factors for stent failure after successful insertion in patients with obstructed, infected upper tract stones
- PMID: 26085874
- PMCID: PMC4455634
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2456
National rates and risk factors for stent failure after successful insertion in patients with obstructed, infected upper tract stones
Abstract
Introduction: We report the incidence of stent failure, defined as the need for salvage percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement following the placement of a ureteral stent, in patients with infection of an obstructed urinary tract secondary to urolithiasis. We also sought to identify risk factors associated with ureteral stent failure.
Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we used time trend analysis to examine the incidence of ureteral stent failure for infected urolithiasis, as well as the estimated annual percent change (EAPC) from 1998 to 2010. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds of stent failure based on patient and hospital characteristics.
Results: A total of 164 546 stents were placed during the study period. Of these, 97.8% resulted in successful decompression. The rates of successful stent decompression and stent failure increased over time (EAPC 14.05%, p < 0.001; EAPC 11.61%, p < 0.001). Middle-aged males with renal stones and acute kidney failure had higher odds of stent failure (p < 0.05). Salvage percutaneous nephrostomies were performed most frequently in urban teaching institutions (odds ratio [OR] 1.98, p = 0.001; OR 1.83, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Ureteral stent decompression for an infected obstructed urinary tract secondary to urolithiasis is almost always effective. For a small proportion of patients, stent failure will occur and will require the placement of a nephrostomy tube. Stent failure is associated with male gender, stone location, and renal failure. Salvage percutaneous nephrostomies for these patients occur most frequently in urban teaching hospitals. Of note, this study was limited by the presumption that coding for a PCN after stent placement indicated stent failure, which could not be verified because of the inherent limitations of the dataset.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Ureteric stents vs percutaneous nephrostomy for initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi: a prospective, randomised study.BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):473-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12768. Epub 2014 Oct 20. BJU Int. 2015. PMID: 24698195 Clinical Trial.
-
Are there any predictive risk factors for failure of ureteric stent in patients with obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis?Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Nov;59(6):371-375. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.6.371. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Investig Clin Urol. 2018. PMID: 30402569 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States.Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.035. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23031677
-
Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications.Eur Radiol. 2006 Sep;16(9):2016-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0136-7. Epub 2006 Mar 18. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16547709 Review.
-
Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stent in hydronephrosis secondary to obstructive urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian J Urol. 2024 Apr;11(2):261-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Dec 9. Asian J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38680594 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):383-393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7652. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021. PMID: 34847343 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):E676-E690. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7581. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021. PMID: 34464257 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Retrograde pyelography predicts retrograde ureteral stenting failure and reduces unnecessary stenting trials in patients with advanced non-urological malignant ureteral obstruction.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0184965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184965. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28931043 Free PMC article.
-
[Management of ureteral obstruction : Value of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stents].Urologe A. 2016 Nov;55(11):1497-1510. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0253-8. Urologe A. 2016. PMID: 27787581 Review. German.
-
Use of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting in management of ureteral obstruction.World J Nephrol. 2016 Mar 6;5(2):172-81. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.172. World J Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26981442 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sammon JD, Ghani KR, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2013;64:85–92. - PubMed
-
- Matlaga BR. How do we manage infected, obstructed hydronephrosis? Eur Urol. 2013;64:93–4. - PubMed
-
- Lee WJ, Patel U, Patel S, et al. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: Results and complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:135–9. - PubMed
-
- Pearle MS, Pierce HL, Miller GL, et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998;160:1260–4. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources