Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 7;290(32):19923-32.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.669002. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Intramolecular Binding of the Rad9 C Terminus in the Checkpoint Clamp Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 Is Closely Linked with Its DNA Binding

Affiliations

Intramolecular Binding of the Rad9 C Terminus in the Checkpoint Clamp Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 Is Closely Linked with Its DNA Binding

Yukimasa Takeishi et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

The human checkpoint clamp Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) is loaded onto chromatin by its loader complex, Rad17-RFC, following DNA damage. The 120-amino acid (aa) stretch of the Rad9 C terminus (C-tail) is unstructured and projects from the core ring structure (CRS). Recent studies showed that 9-1-1 and CRS bind DNA independently of Rad17-RFC. The DNA-binding affinity of mutant 9(ΔC)-1-1, which lacked the Rad9 C-tail, was much higher than that of wild-type 9-1-1, suggesting that 9-1-1 has intrinsic DNA binding activity that manifests in the absence of the C-tail. C-tail added in trans interacted with CRS and prevented it from binding to DNA. We narrowed down the amino acid sequence in the C-tail necessary for CRS binding to a 15-aa stretch harboring two conserved consecutive phenylalanine residues. We prepared 9-1-1 mutants containing the variant C-tail deficient for CRS binding, and we demonstrated that the mutant form restored DNA binding as efficiently as 9(ΔC)-1-1. Furthermore, we mapped the sequence necessary for TopBP1 binding within the same 15-aa stretch, demonstrating that TopBP1 and CRS share the same binding region in the C-tail. Indeed, we observed their competitive binding to the C-tail with purified proteins. The importance of interaction between 9-1-1 and TopBP1 for DNA damage signaling suggests that the competitive interactions of TopBP1 and CRS with the C-tail will be crucial for the activation mechanism.

Keywords: DNA damage response; DNA-protein interaction; checkpoint control; clamp protein; protein phosphorylation; protein/protein interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
DNA binding of 9ΔC-1-1 analyzed by EMSA. Autoradiographs of EMSA with 9-1-1 or 9ΔC-1-1 under various conditions are shown. A, increasing amounts of 9-1-1 or 9ΔC-1-1 (0, 0.06, 0.17, 0.5, 1.5, 3, and 6 pmol each) were incubated with 5′ end DNA. B, 9ΔC-1-1 (2 pmol) was incubated with 5′ end DNA, with or without 250 ng of anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody. A super-shifted band appeared in the presence of the antibody. C, 9ΔC-1-1 (0, 0.75, or 1.5 pmol) was incubated with the 5′ end, 3′ end, ssDNA, and dsDNA. D, 9ΔC-1-1 (0, 1.5, or 3 pmol) was incubated with ssDNA or dsDNA with lengths ranging from 30- to 90-mer. E, 9ΔC-1-1 (0, 2.5, and 5 pmol) was incubated with various 49-mer DNAs (ss, ds, 5′ end, 3′ end, and fork). It should be noted that differences among experiments in DNA-binding efficiencies were the result of different specific activities of 9ΔC-1-1 preparations. Intensities of the shifted bands in A, C, D, and E were quantified, and their ratios (%) relative to total DNA are graphed on the right side or below. Values represent the means of three independent experiments, and error bars indicate S.E. A, inset is Kd of 9ΔC-1-1, which was estimated as 2.2 × 10−7 from the quantified shifted bands, although the values of the shifted bands of 9-1-1 were too low to estimate the precise Kd value from this study.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Binding of C-tail with 9-1-1 and 9ΔC-1-1. A and B, glutathione-Sepharose beads pre-bound with GST only or GST/FLAG-tagged C-tails (from E. coli cells in A, and EC and HF in B from E. coli and insect cells, respectively) were mixed with 10 pmol each of purified 9-1-1 or 9ΔC-1-1 at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing the beads, input proteins (1%) and bound proteins (20%) were analyzed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies for 9-1-1 subunits (upper panel), and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (A) or Ponceau S (B) for C-tail (lower panels). Asterisks indicate degraded C-tail fragments.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Analyses of amino acid sequence of C-tail necessary for its binding to 9ΔC-1-1. A, schematic illustration of human C-tail and its deletions used in this study. C-tail, C-N, and C-C contain aa 272–391, aa 272–332, and aa 333–391, respectively. Constructs Δ336, Δ341, Δ351d5, Δ351, Δ356, Δ361, and Δ371 harbor internal deletions of aa 336–345, aa 341–350, aa 351–355, aa 351–360, aa 356–365, aa 361–370, and aa 371–380 from C-C, respectively; C-tailΔ351d5 and C-tailΔ351 are the same deletions as Δ351d5 and Δ351, respectively, from the C-tail. C-tailFFAA harbors Ala substitutions at both Phe-365 and Phe-366, which were expressed as fusions with GST/FLAG tags at their N-terminal portion. Below is the sequence of the C-tail, including the 15-aa stretch (aa 351–375) required for interaction with CRS. The NLS and FF motif (Phe-365/Phe-366) are boxed in white and black, respectively. B, glutathione-Sepharose beads pre-bound with GST only (mock), GST/FLAG-tagged C-tail (C-tail), C-tail mutant (C-tailFFAA), or its deletions (C-N, C-C, Δ336, Δ341, Δ351d5, Δ351, Δ356, Δ361, Δ371, C-tailΔ351d5, and C-tailΔ351) were mixed with 10 pmol alone (left panel) or 5 and 10 pmol (+, and ++, respectively) (right panel) of purified 9ΔC-1-1, and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing the beads, 50 fmol (left panel) and 100 fmol (right panel) of purified 9ΔC-1-1 and 10% (left panel) or 20% (right panel) of the bound fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Rad1 antibody (upper panels) and staining with Ponceau S for the C-tail and its deletions (lower panels). Asterisks indicate degraded C-tail fragments.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Effects of intramolecular binding on DNA binding by 9-1-1. A, increasing amounts of C-tail or C-tailFFAA (2.5, 5, 10, or 20 pmol) were added to a DNA-binding assay containing 9ΔC-1-1 (2 pmol) and ssDNA (90-mer, 5 fmol) and analyzed as in Fig. 1 (left panel). The ratios of bound DNA (% of total DNA) obtained as the means of two independent experiments as in Fig. 1D are plotted in the right graph; error bars indicate S.E. B, increasing amounts of 9-1-1 and 9-1-1 mutant (9ΔC-1-1, 9Δ351d5-1-1, 9Δ351-1-1) (1, 2, or 4 pmol each) were incubated with ssDNA, analyzed (left panel), and quantitated (right panel) as in A.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Analyses of the interaction of TopBP1 with C-tail, its Ala substitution mutant, and its deletions. A, C-tail fragments used for this analysis as indicated in Fig. 3A, except for C-C2A, which contains Ala substitutions at both Ser-341 and Ser-387. B, glutathione-Sepharose beads pre-bound with GST only (mock), GST/FLAG-tagged C-tail (C-tail), and its derivatives were prepared as Fig. 3, except for treatment with CK2 for 1 h at 30 °C, followed by three washes. A portion (20%) of the bound fractions was used for Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining (upper left panel), and 0.5% was used for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (remaining panels). C and D, prepared beads as B with (C and D) or without (C) CK2 treatment were mixed with 5 or 10 μl of lysates of insect cells expressing TopBP1; 1 μl of the lysates and 25% of the bound fractions were analyzed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. Asterisks indicate degraded C-tail fragments.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
TopBP1 and CRS compete each other for C-tail. A, anti-FLAG beads were pre-bound with 10 pmol of purified FLAG-tagged 9ΔC-1-1 and incubated with GST-tagged C-tail with or without CK2 phosphorylation (P-C-tail or C-tail) at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing the beads, 0, 3, or 5 pmol (−, +, or ++, respectively) of purified TopBP1 were added and further incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. One percent of the input fractions and 30% of the bound fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting using indicated antibodies. B, band intensities of C-tail in the bound fractions were divided by that of Rad9ΔC and the values relative to TopBP1 minus experiments as 100% were plotted as means ± S.E. for four independent experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. (1988) The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241, 317–322 - PubMed
    1. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. (1989) Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246, 629–634 - PubMed
    1. Paterson M. C., Smith B. P., Lohman P. H., Anderson A. K., Fishman L. (1976) Defective excision repair of γ-ray-damaged DNA in human (ataxia telangiectasia) fibroblasts. Nature 260, 444–447 - PubMed
    1. Painter R. B., Young B. R. (1980) Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new explanation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7315–7317 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentley N. J., Holtzman D. A., Flaggs G., Keegan K. S., DeMaggio A., Ford J. C., Hoekstra M., Carr A. M. (1996) The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 15, 6641–6651 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms