Outcomes of endovascular occlusion and stenting in the treatment of carotid blowout
- PMID: 26089247
- PMCID: PMC4757328
- DOI: 10.1177/1591019915590078
Outcomes of endovascular occlusion and stenting in the treatment of carotid blowout
Abstract
Background and purpose: Carotid blowout is a life threatening complication of invasive head and neck cancers and their treatments. This is commonly treated with endovascular embolization and carotid stenting. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we report the immediate clinical results of patients receiving embolization and/or stenting for treatment of carotid blowout associated with head and neck cancer.
Materials and methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the period 2003-2011, we defined carotid blowout patients as those with head and neck malignancies receiving carotid stenting and/or endovascular embolization without open surgery. Outcomes studied included mortality, acute ischemic stroke, hemiplegia/paresis, and other post-operative neurologic complications. Outcomes for the endovascular embolization and carotid stenting group were compared.
Results: A total of 1218 patients underwent endovascular treatment for carotid blowout. Of these, 1080 patients (88.6%) underwent embolization procedures and 138 patients (11.4%) underwent carotid stenting. The mortality rate of endovascular embolization patients was similar to that of carotid stenting patients (8.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.5%-9.7% versus 10.2%, 95% CI=6.0%-16.4%, p = 0.36). Stroke rate was similar between embolization patients and stenting patients (2.3%, 95% CI=1.6%-3.4% vs. 3.4%, 95% CI=1.3%-8.4%, p = 0.43). Hemiplegia rates were significantly higher rate in stenting patients compared with endovascular occlusion patients (3.8%, 95% CI=1.3%-8.4% vs. 1.4%, 95% CI=1.4%-2.4%, p = 0.05). The rate of post-operative neurologic complications was higher in stenting patients compared with embolization patients (6.5%, 95% CI=3.3%-12.1% vs. 1.4%, 95% CI=0.9%-2.4%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Given the natural history of carotid blowout, carotid stenting and endovascular embolization are acceptable means of treating this disease. Endovascular embolization remains the most common treatment among patients with head and neck cancers with lower overall rates of post-operative neurologic complications, including hemiplegia/paresis and stroke.
Keywords: Endovascular; carotid blowout; coiling; stenting.
© The Author(s) 2015.
Similar articles
-
Safety and effectiveness of endovascular embolization or stent-graft reconstruction for treatment of acute carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer: Case series and systematic review of observational studies.Head Neck. 2018 Apr;40(4):846-854. doi: 10.1002/hed.25018. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Head Neck. 2018. PMID: 29155470
-
Extracranial/Intracranial Vascular Bypass in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer - Related Carotid Blowout Syndrome.Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1548-1556. doi: 10.1002/lary.29427. Epub 2021 Feb 11. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 33571390
-
Endovascular Management of Post-Irradiated Carotid Blowout Syndrome.PLoS One. 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139821. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26439632 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome.J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.024. J Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28236928 Review.
-
Transarterial endovascular treatment in the management of life-threatening carotid blowout syndrome in head and neck cancer patients: review of the literature.J Mal Vasc. 2013 Dec;38(6):341-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmv.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 6. J Mal Vasc. 2013. PMID: 24210746 Review.
Cited by
-
Covered Stent Graft for Treatment of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct 3:e243228. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3228. Online ahead of print. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39361294
-
Where and How Should Interventional Radiologists Treat for Carotid Blowout Syndrome Patients?Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jul;47(7):962-963. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03788-9. Epub 2024 Jun 26. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38926164 No abstract available.
-
Safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion to prevent carotid blowout syndrome at the distal internal carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a comparison with endovascular occlusion.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1791-1802. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-604. Epub 2024 Jan 9. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024. PMID: 38415115 Free PMC article.
-
Brain abscesses following carotid blowout syndrome: a case report.Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Jan 13;19(4):1319-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.12.015. eCollection 2024 Apr. Radiol Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38292792 Free PMC article.
-
A Treatment Approach for Carotid Blowout Syndrome and Soft Tissue Reconstruction after Radiotherapy in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Report of 2 Cases.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 30;12(9):3221. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093221. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37176661 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kim HS, et al. Life-threatening common carotid artery blowout: rescue treatment with a newly designed self-expanding covered nitinol stent. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 226–231. - PubMed
-
- Mazumdar A, et al. Update on endovascular management of the carotid blowout syndrome. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2009; 19: 271–281. - PubMed
-
- McDonald MW, Moore MG, Johnstone PA. Risk of carotid blowout after reirradiation of the head and neck: A systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 1083–1089. - PubMed
-
- Yamazaki H, et al. Frequency, outcome and prognostic factors of carotid blowout syndrome after hypofractionated re-irradiation of head and neck cancer using CyberKnife: A multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 305–309. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
