Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
- PMID: 26122143
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.026
Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
Abstract
Background & aims: Colonoscopy can decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality, although performing this procedure more frequently than recommended could increase costs and risks to patients. We aimed to determine rates and correlates of physician non-adherence to guidelines for repeat colonoscopy screening and polyp surveillance intervals.
Methods: We performed a multi-center, retrospective, observational study using administrative claims, physician databases, and electronic medical records (EMR) from 1455 patients (50-64 y old) who underwent colonoscopy in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system in fiscal year 2008. Patients had no prior diagnosis of CRC or inflammatory bowel disease, and had not undergone colonoscopy examinations in the previous 10 years. We compared EMR-documented, endoscopist-recommended intervals for colonoscopies with intervals recommended by the 2008 Multi-Society Task Force guidelines.
Results: The overall rate of non-adherence to guideline recommendations was 36% and ranged from 3% to 80% among facilities. Non-adherence was 28% for patients who underwent normal colonoscopies, but 45%-52% after colonoscopies that identified hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps. Most of all recommendations that were not followed recommended a shorter surveillance interval. In adjusted analyses, non-adherence was significantly higher for patients whose colonoscopies identified hyperplastic (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.7-5.5) or high-risk adenomatous polyps (OR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-8.0), compared to patients with normal colonoscopy examinations, but not for patients with low-risk adenomatous polyps (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7). Nonadherence was also associated with bowel preparation quality, geographic region, Charlson comorbidity score, and colonoscopy indication.
Conclusions: In a managed care setting with salaried physicians, endoscopists recommend repeat colonoscopy sooner than guidelines for more than one third of patients. Factors associated with non-adherence to guideline recommendations were colonoscopy findings, quality of bowel preparation, and geographic region. Targeting endoscopist about non-adherence to colonoscopy guidelines could reduce overuse of colonoscopy and associated healthcare costs.
Keywords: Colon Cancer; Early Detection; VA.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1933-1943.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 28219690 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Interval Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Role of Guideline Adherence.Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05754-9. Epub 2019 Aug 1. Dig Dis Sci. 2020. PMID: 31367882 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26439436 Free PMC article.
-
Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence: Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer.Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):2937-45. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x. Epub 2015 May 7. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25947332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.Gastroenterology. 2006 May;130(6):1872-85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012. Gastroenterology. 2006. PMID: 16697750 Review.
Cited by
-
Accuracy of a faecal immunochemical test in patients under colonoscopy surveillance of colorectal adenoma and cancer.Ups J Med Sci. 2023 Jun 23;128. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v128.8869. eCollection 2023. Ups J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37441110 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Epic Smartlist and Lumens Software in Improving OP-29 Compliance at a Tertiary Health Care Network.Cureus. 2023 Jun 9;15(6):e40193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40193. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37431362 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical trial facilitators: A novel approach to support the execution of clinical research at the study site level.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jun;33:101106. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101106. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023. PMID: 37063166 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Measure Low-Value Screening Colonoscopy.Am J Med. 2022 Jun;135(6):715-720.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Am J Med. 2022. PMID: 35219690 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Digital System for Histologic Classification of Colorectal Polyps.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2135271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35271. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34792588 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
