Background: There has been no reported use of Thromboelastography(®) (TEG(®) ) in assessing thrombocytopenic haematological malignancy (HM) patients experiencing bleeding.
Objectives: To assess whether there are differences in TEG(®) variables in thrombocytopenic HM patients experiencing clinically significant bleeding compared with those not experiencing bleeding.
Methods: Thirty adult patients with HM and a total platelet count (TPC) of ≤ 30 × 10(9) L(-1) were observed for greater than or equal to grade two World Health Organisation (WHO) bleeding episodes for 72 h. They had TPC, TEG(®) parameters [maximal amplitude (MA), reaction time (R-time), alpha (α-angle) and functional fibrinogen (FF) levels], activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) measured at inclusion, 24 and 48 h.
Results: Five patients had nine significant bleeding episodes. Patients bleeding (n) were all more hypocoaguable when measured by TEG(®) than patients not bleeding at inclusion n = 4 (MA: 16.9 vs 31.8 mm, P < 0.01; R-time: 10.1 vs 7.5 min, P = 0.02; α-angle: 18.8 vs 28.4, P < 0.01; FF: 182.4 vs 204 mg dL(-1), P < 0.01), at 24 h n = 3 (MA 18 vs 29.4 mm, P = 0.02; R-time: 9.4 vs 7.4 mins, P = 0.02; α-angle: 21.6 vs 26.5, P = 0.04 and FF: 168 vs 201 mg dL(-1) P = 0.01) and at 48 h n = 2 (MA: 29.7 vs 23.0, P = 0.02; R-time: 8.1 vs 6.7 mins, P = 0.05; α-angle: 22.6 vs 26.5, P = 0.04; FF: 170 vs 208 mg dL(-1), P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in TPC, APTT or PT between patients that bled and those that did not at each time point.
Conclusions: Thrombocytopenic HM patients experiencing bleeding are hypocoaguable on TEG(®).
Keywords: haematological malignancy; platelet function monitoring; platelet transfusion; point of care coagulation; transfusion practice.
© 2015 British Blood Transfusion Society.