The Use of Unidirectional Barbed Suture for Urethrovesical Anastomosis during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0131167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131167. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Background: Unidirectional barbed suture (UBS) has been widely used for surgery in recent years, especially for urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, the efficacy and safety comparing it with conventional non-barbed suture (CS) for UVA is still controversial.

Aims: The objective of this study is to assess the current evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of UBS compared with CS for UVA during RARP.

Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, SinoMed (Chinese) and other databases on Oct. 9, 2014 to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other comparative studies evaluating these two types of suture. The outcome measures included anastomosis time operative time, posterior reconstruction (PR) time, postoperative leakage (PL) rate and continence rates at different time points (4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6-12 months) after surgery. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL) and length of catheterization (LOC).

Results: Three RCTs and six observational studies including 786 cases were identified. Meta-analysis of extractable data showed that use of UBS could significantly reduce anastomosis time (weighted mean difference [WMD]:-3.98min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.02 -1.95; p = 0.0001), operative time (WMD:-10.06min; 95% CI, -15.45--4.67; p = 0.0003) and PR time (WMD:-0.93min; 95% CI, -1.52--0.34; p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in PL rate, EBL, LOC, or continence rates at 4-6 weeks, 3 months and 6-12 months after surgery.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that UBS appears to be safe and efficient as CS for UVA during RARP with not only shorter anastomosis time, operative time, PR time, but also equivalent PL rate, EBL, LOC, and continence rates at 4-6 weeks, 3 months and 6-12 months after surgery. For the inherent limitations of the eligible studies, future more persuasive RCTs are needed to confirm and update our findings.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anastomosis, Surgical / methods*
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / rehabilitation
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Operative Time
  • Prostate / pathology
  • Prostate / surgery*
  • Prostatectomy / instrumentation*
  • Prostatectomy / methods
  • Prostatectomy / rehabilitation
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / rehabilitation
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Robotics / instrumentation
  • Seminal Vesicles / surgery
  • Suture Techniques / instrumentation*
  • Suture Techniques / rehabilitation
  • Sutures
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urethra / surgery

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.