Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 10 (7), e0117259
eCollection

Contagion in Mass Killings and School Shootings

Affiliations

Contagion in Mass Killings and School Shootings

Sherry Towers et al. PLoS One.

Abstract

Background: Several past studies have found that media reports of suicides and homicides appear to subsequently increase the incidence of similar events in the community, apparently due to the coverage planting the seeds of ideation in at-risk individuals to commit similar acts.

Methods: Here we explore whether or not contagion is evident in more high-profile incidents, such as school shootings and mass killings (incidents with four or more people killed). We fit a contagion model to recent data sets related to such incidents in the US, with terms that take into account the fact that a school shooting or mass murder may temporarily increase the probability of a similar event in the immediate future, by assuming an exponential decay in contagiousness after an event.

Conclusions: We find significant evidence that mass killings involving firearms are incented by similar events in the immediate past. On average, this temporary increase in probability lasts 13 days, and each incident incites at least 0.30 new incidents (p = 0.0015). We also find significant evidence of contagion in school shootings, for which an incident is contagious for an average of 13 days, and incites an average of at least 0.22 new incidents (p = 0.0001). All p-values are assessed based on a likelihood ratio test comparing the likelihood of a contagion model to that of a null model with no contagion. On average, mass killings involving firearms occur approximately every two weeks in the US, while school shootings occur on average monthly. We find that state prevalence of firearm ownership is significantly associated with the state incidence of mass killings with firearms, school shootings, and mass shootings.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Number of mass killings, school shootings, and mass shootings over time for the data samples used in these studies.
For clarity of presentation, all data samples are shown over the same time frame. Overlaid is the fit of the full model of Eq 4 that also contains a contagion component (red). The green line indicates the estimated portion of the data due to contagion. The points along the x axis for the first three samples indicate the date of events that had number of people killed in the top 5th percentile for that sample.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Relationship of state prevalence of firearm ownership, mental illness, and state rankings of strength of firearm legislation, to the state incidence of mass killings, school shootings, and mass shootings.
Correlations with ∣ρ∣ ≥ 0.28 are significant to p < 0.05.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 7 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Savastana MA. Tattle-telling on the United States: School violence and the international blame game. Penn St Int’l L Rev 2002; 21: 649.
    1. Krug EG, Powell KE, Dahlberg LL. Firearm-related deaths in the United States and 35 other high-and upper-middle-income countries. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1998; 27: 214–221. 10.1093/ije/27.2.214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Powell KE. Firearm-and non-firearm-related homicide among children: An international comparison. Homicide Studies. 1998; 2: 83–95. 10.1177/1088767998002001006 - DOI
    1. Richardson EG, Hemenway D. Homicide, suicide, and unintentional firearm fatality: comparing the United States with other high-income countries, 2003. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2011; 70: 238–243. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181dbaddf - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hemenway D, Miller M. Firearm availability and homicide rates across 26 high-income countries. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2000; 49(6): 985–988. 10.1097/00005373-200012000-00001 - DOI - PubMed

Grant support

The authors have no support or funding to report.
Feedback