[Is the stomach a main landmark on the abdominal circumference? Audit of 3 operators]

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 May;45(5):484-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objectives: The fetal weight estimation depends largely on the accuracy of abdominal circumference. The quality criteria are standardized to minimize variability and include visualization of the stomach. The objective of this study is to investigate the presence or absence of the stomach on the abdominal circumference for 3 different operators.

Material and methods: We conducted re-reading of 204 ultrasound images in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, performed by three operators, at the maternity Port Royal in Paris in 2013. On these images, the presence of the stomach was sought and other quality criteria were verified.

Results: Among the 204 images, 166 included the stomach (81%). When studying for each of the three operators, there were 79%, 72% and 98% of the stomach into the abdominal circumference, a significant difference between operators (P=0.0029). Regarding the secondary criteria, the quality criteria found most often were the calipers and well placed ellipse (89%).

Conclusion: According to the previous studies, the stomach seems to be a reference to search. Our study shows variability depending on the different operators. If a hierarchy of quality criteria is to be considered, the stomach does not seem to be the first criterion to search.

Keywords: Abdominal circumference; Biométries fœtales; Fetal biometry; Mesure échographique; Périmètre abdominal; Reproducibility; Reproductibilité; Ultrasound measurement.

MeSH terms

  • Abdomen / embryology*
  • Anthropometry
  • Female
  • Fetal Weight*
  • Gestational Age
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Stomach / embryology*
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal*