Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
- PMID: 26157077
- PMCID: PMC4496786
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3480
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic and triage accuracy of online symptom checkers (tools that use computer algorithms to help patients with self diagnosis or self triage).
Design: Audit study.
Setting: Publicly available, free symptom checkers.
Participants: 23 symptom checkers that were in English and provided advice across a range of conditions. 45 standardized patient vignettes were compiled and equally divided into three categories of triage urgency: emergent care required (for example, pulmonary embolism), non-emergent care reasonable (for example, otitis media), and self care reasonable (for example, viral upper respiratory tract infection).
Main outcome measures: For symptom checkers that provided a diagnosis, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker listed the correct diagnosis first or within the first 20 potential diagnoses (n=770 standardized patient evaluations). For symptom checkers that provided a triage recommendation, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker correctly recommended emergent care, non-emergent care, or self care (n=532 standardized patient evaluations).
Results: The 23 symptom checkers provided the correct diagnosis first in 34% (95% confidence interval 31% to 37%) of standardized patient evaluations, listed the correct diagnosis within the top 20 diagnoses given in 58% (55% to 62%) of standardized patient evaluations, and provided the appropriate triage advice in 57% (52% to 61%) of standardized patient evaluations. Triage performance varied by urgency of condition, with appropriate triage advice provided in 80% (95% confidence interval 75% to 86%) of emergent cases, 55% (47% to 63%) of non-emergent cases, and 33% (26% to 40%) of self care cases (P<0.001). Performance on appropriate triage advice across the 23 individual symptom checkers ranged from 33% (95% confidence interval 19% to 48%) to 78% (64% to 91%) of standardized patient evaluations.
Conclusions: Symptom checkers had deficits in both triage and diagnosis. Triage advice from symptom checkers is generally risk averse, encouraging users to seek care for conditions where self care is reasonable.
© Semigran et al 2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Comment in
-
Fifty million people use computerised self triage.BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3727. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26156750 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(11):514-519. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50600. Epub 2020 May 11. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 32391611
-
Accuracy of a Popular Online Symptom Checker for Ophthalmic Diagnoses.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 1;137(6):690-692. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0571. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30973602 Free PMC article.
-
Triage Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps: 5-Year Follow-up Evaluation.J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 10;24(5):e31810. doi: 10.2196/31810. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35536633 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review.NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 17;5(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00667-w. NPJ Digit Med. 2022. PMID: 35977992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital and online symptom checkers and assessment services for urgent care to inform a new digital platform: a systematic review.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Aug. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Aug. PMID: 31433612 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Statistical refinement of patient-centered case vignettes for digital health research.Front Digit Health. 2024 Oct 21;6:1411924. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1411924. eCollection 2024. Front Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39498100 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of a Digital Referral Platform to Improve Access to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: A Prospective Observational Study with Real-World Data.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 3;21(10):1318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101318. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39457291 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing diagnostic accuracy in symptom-based health checkers: a comprehensive machine learning approach with clinical vignettes and benchmarking.Front Artif Intell. 2024 Oct 1;7:1397388. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1397388. eCollection 2024. Front Artif Intell. 2024. PMID: 39421435 Free PMC article.
-
Triage Accuracy and the Safety of User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker in a Real-Life Setting: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 26;11:e55099. doi: 10.2196/55099. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39326038 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT-4 and Google Gemini in providing information on retinal detachment: a multicenter expert comparative study.Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00579-9. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024. PMID: 39223678 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gann B. Giving patients choice and control: health informatics on the patient journey. Yearb Med Inform 2012;7:70-3. - PubMed
-
- Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Internet and American life project. Pew Research Center and California Health Care Foundation, 2013:4.
-
- North F, Ward WJ, Varkey P, et al. Should you search the Internet for information about your acute symptom? Telemed J E Health 2012;18:213-8. - PubMed
-
- Black P. The dangers of using Google as a diagnostic aid. Br J Nurs 2009;18:1157. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources