Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;105(9):1943-9.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302629. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

Impact of Health Insurance Type on Trends in Newborn Circumcision, United States, 2000 to 2010

Affiliations

Impact of Health Insurance Type on Trends in Newborn Circumcision, United States, 2000 to 2010

Lee Warner et al. Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: We explored how changes in insurance coverage contributed to recent nationwide decreases in newborn circumcision.

Methods: Hospital discharge data from the 2000-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed to assess trends in circumcision incidence among male newborn birth hospitalizations covered by private insurance or Medicaid. We examined the impact of insurance coverage on circumcision incidence.

Results: Overall, circumcision incidence decreased significantly from 61.3% in 2000 to 56.9% in 2010 in unadjusted analyses (P for trend = .008), but not in analyses adjusted for insurance status (P for trend = .46) and other predictors (P for trend = .55). Significant decreases were observed only in the South, where adjusted analyses revealed decreases in circumcision overall (P for trend = .007) and among hospitalizations with Medicaid (P for trend = .005) but not those with private insurance (P for trend = .13). Newborn male birth hospitalizations covered by Medicaid increased from 36.0% (2000) to 50.1% (2010; P for trend < .001), suggesting 390,000 additional circumcisions might have occurred nationwide had insurance coverage remained constant.

Conclusions: Shifts in insurance coverage, particularly toward Medicaid, likely contributed to decreases in newborn circumcision nationwide and in the South. Barriers to the availability of circumcision should be revisited, particularly for families who desire but have less financial access to the procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Medicaid coverage of newborn circumcision procedures by state: United States.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Incidence of newborn circumcision among male newborn hospitalizations by type of health insurance in (a) the United States, (b) Northeast, (c) Midwest, (d) South, and (e) West: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2000–2010.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Increase in proportion of male newborn hospitalizations covered by Medicaid in relation to the observed and expected number of circumcision events nationwide: United States, 2000–2010.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e756–e785. - PubMed
    1. Tobian AA, Gray RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1479–1480. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585–586. - PubMed
    1. El Bcheraoui C, Zhang X, Cooper CS, Rose CE, Kilmarx PH, Chen RT. Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in US medical settings, 2001 to 2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):625–634. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 1999;103(3):686–693. - PubMed