Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;136(2):e482-9.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0737. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value

Affiliations

Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value

Timmy Ho et al. Pediatrics. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The use of unnecessary tests and treatments contributes to health care waste. The "Choosing Wisely" campaign charges medical societies with identifying such items. This report describes the identification of 5 tests and treatments in newborn medicine.

Methods: A national survey identified candidate tests and treatments. An expert panel of 51 individuals representing 28 perinatal care organizations narrowed the list over 3 rounds of a modified Delphi process. In the final round, the panel was provided with Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) literature summaries of the top 12 tests and treatments.

Results: A total of 1648 candidate tests and 1222 treatments were suggested by 1047 survey respondents. After 3 Delphi rounds, the expert panel achieved consensus on the following top 5 items: (1) avoid routine use of antireflux medications for treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease or for treatment of apnea and desaturation in preterm infants, (2) avoid routine continuation of antibiotic therapy beyond 48 hours for initially asymptomatic infants without evidence of bacterial infection, (3) avoid routine use of pneumograms for predischarge assessment of ongoing and/or prolonged apnea of prematurity, (4) avoid routine daily chest radiographs without an indication for intubated infants, and (5) avoid routine screening term-equivalent or discharge brain MRIs in preterm infants.

Conclusions: The Choosing Wisely Top Five for newborn medicine highlights tests and treatments that cannot be adequately justified on the basis of efficacy, safety, or cost. This list serves as a starting point for quality improvement efforts to optimize both clinical outcomes and resource utilization in newborn care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Horbar is the Chief Executive Officer of the Vermont Oxford Network (VON); and Drs Ho, Dukhovny, Zupancic, Goldmann, and Pursley have received honoraria for faculty participation from VON.

Figures

FIGURE 1. Methodology for the development of the Choosing Wisely Top Five list for newborn medicine. The process by which 2870 suggestions by 1047 survey respondents were reduced by a 51-member expert panel to the Top Five list is shown. SoPPe, Section on Perinatal Pediatrics; VON, Vermont Oxford Network.
FIGURE 1
Methodology for the development of the Choosing Wisely Top Five list for newborn medicine. The process by which 2870 suggestions by 1047 survey respondents were reduced by a 51-member expert panel to the Top Five list is shown. SoPPe, Section on Perinatal Pediatrics; VON, Vermont Oxford Network.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berwick DM , Hackbarth AD . Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1513–1516 - PubMed
    1. ABIM Foundation. Choosing Wisely. Available at: www.choosingwisely.org/. Accessed February 13, 2015
    1. ABIM Foundation. About Choosing Wisely. Available at: www.choosingwisely.org/about-us/. Accessed February 13, 2015
    1. ABIM Foundation. Choosing Wisely physician and patient lists. Available at: www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/. Accessed February 13, 2015
    1. Fitch K . The Rand/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Santa Monica, CA: Rand; 2001.

Publication types