Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul 29;17(7):e189.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.3898.

Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial

Alison E Turnbull et al. J Med Internet Res. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Survey response rates among physicians are declining, and determining an appropriate level of compensation to motivate participation poses a major challenge.

Objective: To estimate the effect of permitting intensive care physicians to select their preferred level of compensation for completing a short Web-based survey on physician (1) response rate, (2) survey completion rate, (3) time to response, and (4) time spent completing the survey.

Methods: A total of 1850 US intensivists from an existing database were randomized to receive a survey invitation email with or without an Amazon.com incentive available to the first 100 respondents. The incentive could be instantly redeemed for an amount chosen by the respondent, up to a maximum of US $50.

Results: The overall response rate was 35.90% (630/1755). Among the 35.4% (111/314) of eligible participants choosing the incentive, 80.2% (89/111) selected the maximum value. Among intensivists offered an incentive, the response was 6.0% higher (95% CI 1.5-10.5, P=.01), survey completion was marginally greater (807/859, 94.0% vs 892/991, 90.0%; P=.06), and the median number of days to survey response was shorter (0.8, interquartile range [IQR] 0.2-14.4 vs 6.6, IQR 0.3-22.3; P=.001), with no difference in time spent completing the survey.

Conclusions: Permitting intensive care physicians to determine compensation level for completing a short Web-based survey modestly increased response rate and substantially decreased response time without decreasing the time spent on survey completion.

Keywords: cash; data collection; electronic questionnaire; monetary incentives; physicians; response rate; survey design.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profile. Eligible participants had treated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting during the last 2 years.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles

References

    1. Klabunde CN, Willis GB, McLeod CC, Dillman DA, Johnson TP, Greene SM, Brown ML. Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda. Eval Health Prof. 2012 Dec 1;35(4):477–506. doi: 10.1177/0163278712458283. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cull WL, O'Connor KG, Sharp S, Tang SS. Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):213–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:160. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho YI, Johnson TP, Vangeest JB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep 1;36(3):382–407. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback