Inability of polymerase chain reaction, pyrosequencing, and culture of infected and uninfected site skin biopsy specimens to identify the cause of cellulitis
- PMID: 26240200
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ655
Inability of polymerase chain reaction, pyrosequencing, and culture of infected and uninfected site skin biopsy specimens to identify the cause of cellulitis
Abstract
Background: The cause of cellulitis is unclear. Streptococcus pyogenes, and to a lesser extent, Staphylococcus aureus, are presumed pathogens.
Methods: We conducted a study of adults with acute cellulitis without drainage presenting to a US emergency department research network. Skin biopsy specimens were taken from the infected site and a comparable uninfected site on the opposite side of the body. Microbiology was evaluated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), pyrosequencing, and standard culture techniques. To determine the cause, the prevalence and quantity of bacterial species at the infected and uninfected sites were compared.
Results: Among 50 subjects with biopsy specimens from infected and uninfected sites, culture rarely identified a bacterium. Among 49 subjects with paired specimens from infected and uninfected sites tested with PCR, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was identified in 20 (41%) and 17 (34%), respectively. Pyrosequencing identified abundant atypical bacteria in addition to streptococci and staphylococci. Among 49 subjects with paired specimens tested by pyrosequencing, S. aureus was identified from 11 (22%) and 15 (31%) and streptococci from 15 (31%) and 20 (41%) of the specimens, respectively. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was not found by culture or PCR, and S. pyogenes was not identified by any technique.
Conclusions: The bacterial cause of cellulitis cannot be determined by comparing the prevalence and quantity of pathogens from infected and uninfected skin biopsy specimens using current molecular techniques. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was detected but not methicillin-resistant S. aureus or S. pyogenes from cellulitis tissue specimens. For now, optimal treatment will need to be guided by clinical trials. Noninfectious causes should also be explored.
Keywords: PCR; cellulitis; culture; polymerase chain reaction; pyrosequencing.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Etiology of Cellulitis and the Validity of New and Old Methods.Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 1;62(7):954-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw003. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26743089 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Bruun et al.Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 1;62(7):955-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw005. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26743095 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Bacterial Etiology and Risk Factors Associated with Cellulitis and Purulent Skin Abscesses in Military Trainees.PLoS One. 2016 Oct 25;11(10):e0165491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165491. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27780238 Free PMC article.
-
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common identified cause of cellulitis: a systematic review.Epidemiol Infect. 2010 Mar;138(3):313-7. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809990483. Epub 2009 Aug 3. Epidemiol Infect. 2010. PMID: 19646308 Review.
-
A multiplex PCR assay for detection of Vibrio vulnificus, Aeromonas hydrophila, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus agalactiae from the isolates of patients with necrotizing fasciitis.Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;81:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Jan 25. Int J Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30690211
-
Cutaneous bacterial infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes in infants and children.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Apr;61(2):457-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 23. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014. PMID: 24636656 Review.
-
Specific PCR, bacterial culture, serology and pharyngeal sampling to enhance the aetiological diagnosis of cellulitis.J Med Microbiol. 2016 Jan;65(1):44-47. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000191. J Med Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 26487664
Cited by
-
Diagnostic methods for the confirmation of non-purulent cellulitis: a review.Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Nov;315(9):2519-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02658-7. Epub 2023 Jul 8. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023. PMID: 37421422 Review.
-
Standardization of Epidemiological Surveillance of Group A Streptococcal Cellulitis.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 15;9(Suppl 1):S25-S30. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac267. eCollection 2022 Sep. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36128406 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Recurrent Severe Cellulitis with a Pill in Pocket Approach.Infect Chemother. 2022 Jun;54(2):382-387. doi: 10.3947/ic.2021.0095. Epub 2022 Jan 14. Infect Chemother. 2022. PMID: 35132835 Free PMC article.
-
55-year old woman with erysipelas.Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020 Aug;37(4):613-616. doi: 10.5114/ada.2020.98225. Epub 2020 Sep 2. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020. PMID: 32994788 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Development and Treatment of Lymphatic Dysfunction in Cancer Patients and Survivors.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 14;12(8):2280. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082280. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32823928 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
