Use and Outcomes of Triple Therapy Among Older Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation
- PMID: 26248987
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.062
Use and Outcomes of Triple Therapy Among Older Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
Background: Antithrombotic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) with atrial fibrillation (AF) among higher risk older patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.
Objectives: This study sought to determine appropriate antithrombotic therapy for acute MI patients with AF treated with PCI.
Methods: We examined 4,959 patients ≥65 years of age with acute MI and AF who underwent coronary stenting (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines). The primary effectiveness outcome was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comprising death, readmission for MI, or stroke; the primary safety outcome was bleeding readmission. Outcomes with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or triple therapy (DAPT plus warfarin) were compared using Cox proportional hazard modeling with inverse probability-weighted propensity adjustment.
Results: Among 4,959 patients, 27.6% (n = 1,370) were discharged on triple therapy. Relative to DAPT, patients on triple therapy had a similar risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86 to 1.16]) but significantly greater risk of bleeding requiring hospitalization (adjusted HR: 1.61 [95% CI: 1.31 to 1.97]) and greater risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted HR: 2.04 [95% CI: 1.25 to 3.34]). Of 1,591 Medicare Part D patients, 90-day post-discharge warfarin persistence among patients discharged on warfarin was 93.2% (n = 412). Results of 90-day landmark analyses comparing triple therapy versus DAPT in patients persistently on warfarin versus those not discharged on warfarin who had not filled a warfarin prescription were similar to our primary findings.
Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 4 older AF patients undergoing PCI for MI were discharged on triple therapy. Those receiving triple therapy versus DAPT had higher rates of major bleeding without a measurable difference in composite MI, death, or stroke.
Keywords: antithrombotic therapy; atrial fibrillation; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Triple Therapy...Can We Replace More With Better?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 11;66(6):628-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.079. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26248988 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Warfarin use among older atrial fibrillation patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction managed with coronary stenting and dual antiplatelet therapy.Am Heart J. 2013 Nov;166(5):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 17. Am Heart J. 2013. PMID: 24176442
-
Oral anticoagulation and antiplatelets in atrial fibrillation patients after myocardial infarction and coronary intervention.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):981-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.029. Epub 2013 Jun 7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23747760
-
Prevalence, Management, and Long-Term (6-Year) Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):1075-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.028. Epub 2017 May 17. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28527773
-
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy with or without warfarin in patients with a clinical indication for DAPT and chronic anticoagulation: A meta-analysis of observational studies.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;88(1):E12-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26234. Epub 2015 Sep 10. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26354765 Review.
-
Triple therapy: A review of antithrombotic treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.J Cardiol. 2019 Jan;73(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 4. J Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30293674 Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in Off-Label Indications of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 25;24(6):180. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406180. eCollection 2023 Jun. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077529 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Elderly.Int J Angiol. 2022 Aug 25;31(4):244-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1751234. eCollection 2022 Dec. Int J Angiol. 2022. PMID: 36588871 Free PMC article.
-
Current and Future Insights for Optimizing Antithrombotic Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 23;11(19):5605. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195605. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36233469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Focused Review on High Bleeding Risk.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Oct 1;29(10):1409-1420. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17066. Epub 2022 Aug 6. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022. PMID: 35934784 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long term risk and costs of bleeding in men and women treated with triple antithrombotic therapy-An observational study.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248359. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33764988 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
