It is unclear whether vitamin K antagonists affect stroke severity and outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate this association. We prospectively studied 539 consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke (41.2 % males, age 78.9 ± 6.6 years). The severity of stroke was assessed at admission with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The outcome was assessed with dependency rates at discharge (modified Rankin scale 2-5) and with in-hospital mortality. 177 patients had a history of AF. The median NIHSS at admission did not differ between patients on acenocoumarol with INR 2.0-3.0, on acenocoumarol with INR < 2.0, on single antiplatelet treatment, on dual antiplatelet treatment, or on no treatment [4 (range 0-26), 13 (0-39), 8 (0-33), 3 (2-23) and 7 (0-33), respectively; p = 0.433]. Dependency rates were lower in patients on acenocoumarol with INR 2.0-3.0 or on dual antiplatelet treatment than in those on acenocoumarol with INR < 2.0, single antiplatelet treatment, or no treatment (20.0, 22.2, 61.5, 58.7 and 68.0 %, respectively; p = 0.024). Independent predictors of dependency were age, NIHSS at admission and history of ischemic stroke. In-hospital mortality did not differ between patients on acenocoumarol with INR 2.0-3.0, on acenocoumarol with INR < 2.0, on single antiplatelet treatment, on dual antiplatelet treatment, or on no treatment (7.7, 18.2, 16.1, 16.7 and 22.2 %, respectively; p = 0.822). In conclusion, optimally anticoagulated patients with AF have more favorable functional outcome after stroke and a trend for less severe stroke whereas patients with subtherapeutic anticoagulation have similar stroke severity and outcome with those on no treatment.
Keywords: Acenocoumarol; Aspirin; Ischemic stroke; Stroke severity; Vitamin K antagonists; Warfarin.