Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study
- PMID: 26259154
- PMCID: PMC4840411
- DOI: 10.7326/M14-1720
Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Several methods are recommended equally strongly for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk persons. Risk stratification would enable tailoring of screening within this group, with less invasive tests (sigmoidoscopy or occult blood tests) for lower-risk persons and colonoscopy for higher-risk persons.
Objective: To create a risk index for advanced neoplasia (colorectal cancer and adenomas or serrated polyps ≥1.0 cm, villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia) anywhere in the colorectum, using the most common risk factors for colorectal neoplasia.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Multiple endoscopy units, primarily in the Midwest.
Patients: Persons aged 50 to 80 years undergoing initial screening colonoscopy (December 2004 to September 2011).
Measurements: Derivation and validation of a risk index based on points from regression coefficients for age, sex, waist circumference, cigarette smoking, and family history of colorectal cancer.
Results: Among 2993 persons in the derivation set, prevalence of advanced neoplasia was 9.4%. Risks for advanced neoplasia in persons at very low, low, intermediate, and high risk were 1.92% (95% CI, 0.63% to 4.43%), 4.88% (CI, 3.79% to 6.18%), 9.93% (CI, 8.09% to 12.0%), and 24.9% (CI, 21.1% to 29.1%), respectively (P < 0.001). Sigmoidoscopy to the descending colon in the low-risk groups would have detected 51 of 70 (73% [CI, 61% to 83%]) advanced neoplasms. Among 1467 persons in the validation set, corresponding risks for advanced neoplasia were 1.65% (CI, 0.20% to 5.84%), 3.31% (CI, 2.08% to 4.97%), 10.9% (CI, 8.26% to 14.1%), and 22.3% (CI, 16.9% to 28.5%), respectively (P < 0.001). Sigmoidoscopy would have detected 21 of 24 (87.5% [CI, 68% to 97%]) advanced neoplasms.
Limitations: Split-sample validation; results apply to first-time screening.
Conclusion: This index stratifies risk for advanced neoplasia among average-risk persons by identifying lower-risk groups for which noncolonoscopy strategies may be effective and efficient and a higher-risk group for which colonoscopy may be preferred.
Primary funding source: National Cancer Institute, Walther Cancer Institute, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, and Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.
Comment in
-
Precision Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Promise and Challenges.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):390-1. doi: 10.7326/M15-1677. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26258984 No abstract available.
-
Simple risk score for colon cancer identifies people likely to benefit from colonoscopy.BMJ. 2015 Aug 10;351:h4323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4323. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26265707 No abstract available.
-
Identifying Risk Categories in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Promise and Challenges.Gastroenterology. 2016 Apr;150(4):1035-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.052. Epub 2016 Feb 27. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26922868 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Gastroenterology. 2016 Apr;150(4):1037. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.053. Epub 2016 Feb 27. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26926450 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 16;139(12):959-65. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 14678915
-
Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Using the National Cancer Institute's Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Aug 31;109(1):djw181. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw181. Print 2017 Jan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016. PMID: 27582444 Free PMC article.
-
Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25083562
-
Detection of proximal adenomatous polyps with screening sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy.Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 24;163(4):413-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.413. Arch Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12588199 Review.
-
Colon cancer screening. Sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997 Jul;7(3):365-86. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997. PMID: 9177140 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia varies by race and neighbourhood socioeconomic status.Fam Med Community Health. 2024 May 30;12(Suppl 2):e002892. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002892. Fam Med Community Health. 2024. PMID: 39574362 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;16(8):1530. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081530. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and validation of a prediction model for early screening of people at high risk for colorectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 7;30(5):450-461. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i5.450. World J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38414586 Free PMC article.
-
Reply: Request for clarification on symptom assessment methodology in high-risk population colonoscopy study.Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15629-15631. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6164. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37264753 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Joint Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE)-Asian Pacific Society of Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE) clinical practice guidelines on the use of non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.Gut. 2023 Jul;72(7):1240-1254. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329429. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Gut. 2023. PMID: 37019620 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Steele CB, Rim SH, Joseph DA, King JB, Seeff LC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Colorectal cancer incidence and screening—United States, 2008 and 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62(Suppl 3):53–60. - PubMed
-
- Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:638–58. - PubMed
-
- Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA. 2000;284:1954–61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical