Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul 30;7(8):4254-81.
doi: 10.3390/v7082819.

Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops

Affiliations
Review

Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops

Jan M Lucht. Viruses. .

Abstract

A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths-also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops-of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer's attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion-including calls for labeling of GM food-in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers' concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers' attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values.

Keywords: GMO labeling; consumers; farmers; knowledge; new breeding techniques; personal attitudes; politics; risk/benefit perception; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bruening G., Lyons J.M. The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. Calif. Agric. 2000;54:6–7. doi: 10.3733/ca.v054n04p6. - DOI
    1. James C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA; Ithaca, NY, USA: 2014. ISAAA Brief.
    1. Dillen K., Demont M., Tillie P., Rodriguez Cerezo E. Bred for Europe but grown in America: The case of GM sugar beet. New Biotechnol. 2013;30:131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gonsalves C.V., Gonsalves D. The Hawaii papaya story. In: Smyth S.J., Phillips P.W.B., Castle D., editors. Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development. Edward Elgar Publishers; Northhampton, MA, USA: 2014. pp. 642–660.
    1. Klümper W., Qaim M. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111629. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms